Literature DB >> 8366803

Novel approaches to low-cost MRI.

A Macovski1, S Conolly.   

Abstract

This paper presents a combination of speculative approaches, some related to earlier work and some apparently novel, which show great promise in providing a new class of MRI machines that would be considerably less expensive. This class would have advantages and disadvantages as compared to existing MRI, over and above that of low cost. The disadvantages include the apparent inability to perform classic spectroscopy, and limited flexibility in the area of selective excitation. The advantages include a fundamental immunity to inhomogeneity and susceptibility problems, the ability to create a wide class of machines that are designed for specific anatomy-related applications, the ability to design open machines for physician access, and improved capability for high speed imaging. Generic to all of the methods presented are a pulsed polarizing field and an oscillatory read-out bias field. The pulsed field initially polarizes the magnetic moments. Since it is not on during the readout operation it has negligible homogeneity requirements since changes in the field amplitude will merely shade the image intensity. During readout a relatively low bias field is used. To enable the use of a relatively inhomogeneous bias field, an oscillatory field is used that has a zero average value. This prevents any long-term buildup of phase errors due to a frequency error associated with inhomogeneity. Thus the average bias frequency will be determined solely by the frequency rather than the amplitude of the bias field. Three methods are described, all including the above features. The first two involve imaging in the laboratory frame, while the third involves imaging in the rotating frame. The second approach requires no RF excitation and the third approach uses RF bias and gradient signals. Some approaches to slice selection are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8366803     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910300211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  26 in total

1.  Gradiometer pick-up coil design for a low field SQUID-MRI system.

Authors:  H C Seton; J M Hutchison; D M Bussell
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  A desktop magnetic resonance imaging system.

Authors:  Steven M Wright; David G Brown; Jay R Porter; David C Spence; Emilio Esparza; David C Cole; F Russell Huson
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Amplification of xenon NMR and MRI by remote detection.

Authors:  Adam J Moulé; Megan M Spence; Song-I Han; Juliette A Seeley; Kimberly L Pierce; Sunil Saxena; Alexander Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Microtesla MRI with a superconducting quantum interference device.

Authors:  Robert McDermott; SeungKyun Lee; Bennie ten Haken; Andreas H Trabesinger; Alexander Pines; John Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The MR Cap: A single-sided MRI system designed for potential point-of-care limited field-of-view brain imaging.

Authors:  Patrick C McDaniel; Clarissa Zimmerman Cooley; Jason P Stockmann; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Parallel MRI at microtesla fields.

Authors:  Vadim S Zotev; Petr L Volegov; Andrei N Matlashov; Michelle A Espy; John C Mosher; Robert H Kraus
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Microtesla MRI of the human brain combined with MEG.

Authors:  Vadim S Zotev; Andrei N Matlashov; Petr L Volegov; Igor M Savukov; Michelle A Espy; John C Mosher; John J Gomez; Robert H Kraus
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Reducing metallic artefacts in post-operative spinal imaging: slice encoding for metal artefact correction with dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation MRI at 3.0 T.

Authors:  K D Song; Y C Yoon; J Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  MRI of the human brain at 130 microtesla.

Authors:  Ben Inglis; Kai Buckenmaier; Paul Sangiorgio; Anders F Pedersen; Matthew A Nichols; John Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.