Literature DB >> 8342071

Busulfan disposition: the role of therapeutic monitoring in bone marrow transplantation induction regimens.

L B Grochow1.   

Abstract

High-dose busulfan is an important component of many bone marrow transplantation (BMT) preparative regimens. The dose-limiting toxicity of busulfan in BMT regimens is hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), which occurs in approximately 20% to 40% of patients. We used a gas chromatography-electron capture detection assay and pharmacokinetic models to examine busulfan disposition in adults and children. Marked interpatient and intrapatient variability in busulfan disposition was observed in both patient populations. Part of the intrapatient variation appeared to be due to circadian changes in busulfan disposition. We also used gas chromatography-electron capture detection and pharmacokinetic models to assess whether excessive exposure to busulfan correlates with an increased risk of VOD. The area under the curve of time versus concentration (AUC) after the first dose of busulfan was measured in patients receiving a 16-dose course of busulfan as part of a BMT preparative regimen. In 27 patients who showed high AUCs (> 1,500 mumol.min/L) after the first dose, the fifth through 16th doses of busulfan were decreased. Patients with high AUCs who did not receive dose adjustments had a 75% incidence of VOD. The incidence of VOD was only 18% in patients with high AUCs whose dose was adjusted on the basis of therapeutic monitoring. 5% for those not needing adjustment. These studies suggest that therapeutic monitoring can play an important role in decreasing the toxicity of BMT preparative regimens. Therapeutic monitoring also may improve treatment efficacy by identifying patients who are not receiving adequate drug exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8342071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  37 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Comparison of algorithms for oral busulphan area under the concentration-time curve limited sampling estimate.

Authors:  Fredrik Sjöö; Ibrahim El-Serafi; Jon Enestig; Jonas Mattsson; Johan Liwing; Moustapha Hassan
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Efficacy and toxicity of radiation in preparative regimens for pediatric stem cell transplantation. II: Deleterious consequences.

Authors:  T D Miale; S Sirithorn; S Ahmed
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Therapeutic drug monitoring for either oral or intravenous busulfan when combined with pre- and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Lindsey R Lombardi; Christopher G Kanakry; Marianna Zahurak; Nadira Durakovic; Javier Bolaños-Meade; Yvette L Kasamon; Douglas E Gladstone; William Matsui; Ivan Borrello; Carol Ann Huff; Lode J Swinnen; Robert A Brodsky; Richard F Ambinder; Ephraim J Fuchs; Gary L Rosner; Richard J Jones; Leo Luznik
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-10-12

Review 6.  Interstrand crosslink inducing agents in pretransplant conditioning therapy for hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Benigno C Valdez; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Mini test dose of intravenous busulfan (busulfex(®)) in allogeneic non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation, followed by liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ivan Spasojevic; Ligia R S da Costa; Mitchell E Horwitz; Gwynn D Long; Keith M Sullivan; John P Chute; Cristina Gasparetto; Ashley Morris; Nelson J Chao; David A Rizzieri
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Cyclophosphamide followed by intravenous targeted busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew R Rezvani; Jeannine S McCune; Barry E Storer; Ami Batchelder; Aiko Kida; H Joachim Deeg; George B McDonald
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Variability in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulphan given as a single daily dose to paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christa E Nath; John W Earl; Nalini Pati; Katherine Stephen; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Busulfan disposition and hepatic veno-occlusive disease in children undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  G Vassal; S Koscielny; D Challine; D Valteau-Couanet; I Boland; A Deroussent; J Lemerle; A Gouyette; O Hartmann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.