Literature DB >> 8336969

Epistaxis: a comparison of treatment.

C B Shaw1, M K Wax, S J Wetmore.   

Abstract

Epistaxis is a common condition as well as a frequent otolaryngologic emergency, with up to 60% of people experiencing one episode in their lifetime and 6% seeking medical attention. Treatment is controversial, with many options being available. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital course and management of 65 patients who experienced epistaxis from January 1, 1986, to October 31, 1991, to compare medical and surgical treatment methods. Fifty-one patients were managed medically. Of these, 36 patients required one treatment (group 1), 10 required multiple treatments (group 2), and seven required multiple admissions (group 3). The mean lengths of hospitalization were 3.27, 4.90, and 5.57 days respectively. Fourteen patients were managed surgically. The preoperative stay of nine patients who underwent unsuccessful medical management at our institution (group 4) was 3.9 days, with an average postoperative stay of 7.3 days. The difference in length of stay was statistically significant between surgical and medical groups and the postoperative stay of group 4 was different from the length of stay of group 1 patients. The remaining five patients were initially treated elsewhere (group 5). Seventeen (33.3%) medical and only 1 (7%) surgical patients underwent unsuccessful initial therapy. Complication rates were not statistically different for each group. Transfusion requirements were evaluated as a possible predictive factor. Eighteen patients (35.3%) in the medically managed group required transfusions, compared with 11 patients (78.6%) treated surgically (p < 0.01). The medical group received an average of 0.91 units, compared to the surgical group that received 2.93 units preoperatively (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8336969     DOI: 10.1177/019459989310900111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  10 in total

1.  Endoscopic management of posterior epistaxis.

Authors:  J Paul; Sohit Paul Kanotra; Sonika Kanotra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02-25

2.  Effective management of epistaxis in athletes.

Authors:  J D Weir
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  First-aid treatment of epistaxis--confirmation of widespread ignorance.

Authors:  D Strachan; J England
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Severe spontaneous epistaxis: retrospective study in a tertiary ENT centre.

Authors:  Eline Marin; Jean-Baptiste Watelet; Philippe Gevaert; Thibaut Van Zele
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Epistaxis: A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Saurabh Varshney; R K Saxena
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-04

6.  Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for refractory posterior epistaxis.

Authors:  A Thakar; C J Sharan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-10

7.  Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for refractory posterior epistaxis.

Authors:  Alok Thakar; Cj Sharan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-07

8.  Efficacy of conservative treatment modalities used in epistaxis.

Authors:  Urvashi Razdan; R M Raizada; V N Chaturvedi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-01

9.  Sphenopalatine artery ligation under local anesthesia: A report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Nico Jonas; Laura Viani; M Walsh
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2010-01-29

10.  Endoscopic cauterization of the sphenopalatine artery to control severe and recurrent posterior epistaxis.

Authors:  Behrooz Gandomi; Mohammad Hosein Arzaghi; Bijan Khademi; Mohammad Rafatbakhsh
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.