Literature DB >> 30888493

Severe spontaneous epistaxis: retrospective study in a tertiary ENT centre.

Eline Marin1, Jean-Baptiste Watelet2, Philippe Gevaert2, Thibaut Van Zele2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical profile and outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients hospitalized for spontaneous severe epistaxis.
METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study of a case series of patients hospitalized for epistaxis in the University Hospital of Ghent between 2005 and 2012.
RESULTS: 124 patients with, respectively, 132 episodes were included. 64% were male. The mean age was 65 years. 73% had comorbidities of which arterial hypertension was the most common. 61% were taking one or more antithrombotics and in 25.7% a recent change in the medication schedule took place. 47% of the episodes necessitated a vascular intervention. The most performed surgery was endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation. The 1-year success rate of conservative treatment was 47% and of vascular intervention 81%. No significant difference between the recurrence rates and need for vascular intervention of the different comorbidities and medications was detected using Pearson chi-squared and Fisher's exact testing. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: The typical pattern of a patient presenting with severe epistaxis was a patient in the sixth decade, male, suffering from comorbidities and taking one or more antithrombotic agents. Based on the above-mentioned success rates of the different treatment options, we think all centres treating epistaxis should apply a well-defined protocol to guide the decision when to proceed with surgery. Furthermore, prospective research needs to precisely investigate the role played by comorbidities and their treatment in the occurrence of epistaxis and to test the effectiveness of proposed algorithms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulants; Comorbidity; Epistaxis; Mortality; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30888493     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05392-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  41 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary surgical treatment of epistaxis. What is the evidence for sphenopalatine artery ligation?

Authors:  S Kumar; A Shetty; J Rockey; E Nilssen
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2003-08

Review 2.  Evaluating and managing the patient with nosebleeds.

Authors:  R Peter Manes
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.456

3.  Nasal bleeding associated with fluoxetine and risperidone interaction: a case report.

Authors:  A Mowla; S A Dastgheib; A A Ebrahimi; A Pani
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.788

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Randy Leung
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Epistaxis: medical versus surgical therapy: a comparison of efficacy, complications, and economic considerations.

Authors:  B Schaitkin; M Strauss; J R Houck
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Early operative intervention versus conventional treatment in epistaxis: randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Ali Moshaver; Jeffrey Richard Harris; Richard Liu; Chris Diamond; Hadi Seikaly
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-06

Review 7.  Epistaxis: update on management.

Authors:  Louise Melia; Gerald W McGarry
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Epidemiology of epistaxis in US emergency departments, 1992 to 2001.

Authors:  Daniel J Pallin; Yi-Mei Chng; Mary Patricia McKay; Jennifer A Emond; Andrea J Pelletier; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

Authors:  M Moscucci; K A A Fox; Christopher P Cannon; W Klein; José López-Sendón; G Montalescot; K White; R J Goldberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Patterns of hospital admission with epistaxis for 26,725 patients over an 18-year period in Wales, UK.

Authors:  S J C Fishpool; A Tomkinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular Treatment of Epistaxis.

Authors:  Joan C Wojak
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Analysis of Bleeding Site to Identify Associated Risk Factors of Intractable Epistaxis.

Authors:  Zhenpeng Liao; Jianling Guo; Jiaoping Mi; Wei Liao; Shulin Chen; Yili Huang; Yingxiang Xu; Jun Zhang; Qintai Yang; Haiyu Hong
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Hospitalization for epistaxis: a population-based healthcare research study in Thuringia, Germany.

Authors:  Max Kallenbach; Andreas Dittberner; Daniel Boeger; Jens Buentzel; Holger Kaftan; Kerstin Hoffmann; Peter Jecker; Andreas Mueller; Gerald Radtke; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.503

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.