Literature DB >> 23120200

Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for refractory posterior epistaxis.

A Thakar1, C J Sharan.   

Abstract

Intractable posterior epistaxis remains a challenging problem for our specialty. Conventional management options in the form of anterior and posterior packing, arterial ligation of the internal maxillary or the external carotid artery and embolization, are not entirely satisfactory because of morbidity, high failure rates and occasional significant complication. Our experience with endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for four patients with posterior epistaxis is described. All patients had epistaxis refractory to anterior and posterior nasal packing, which was rapidly controlled following the procedure. The technique of spheno-palatine artery ligation is described.The technique is simple and effective and prevents the morbidity and complications of nasal packing. It is especially useful in systemically compromised individuals who otherwise tolerate nasal packing poorly. and should be one of the treatment options to be considered relatively early in the management of epistaxis refractory to anterior and posterior nasal packing.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 23120200      PMCID: PMC3451447          DOI: 10.1007/BF02907693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  10 in total

1.  Surgical management of intractable epistaxis: audit of results.

Authors:  V Srinivasan; I W Sherman; G O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Endoscopic ligation of the internal maxillary artery for treatment of intractable posterior epistaxis.

Authors:  J B Pritikin; D D Caldarelli; W R Panje
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Endoscopic ligation or diathermy of the sphenopalatine artery in persistent epistaxis.

Authors:  H R Sharp; J M Rowe-Jones; G S Biring; I S Mackay
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Epistaxis: medical versus surgical therapy: a comparison of efficacy, complications, and economic considerations.

Authors:  B Schaitkin; M Strauss; J R Houck
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Pneumatic nasal catheters: advantages and drawbacks.

Authors:  S Elwany; T Kamel; A Mekhamer
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Embolization for the treatment of posterior epistaxis. An analysis of 31 cases.

Authors:  T M Siniluoto; A S Leinonen; A I Karttunen; H K Karjalainen; K E Jokinen
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-08

7.  Follow-up on maxillary artery ligation for epistaxis.

Authors:  T J McDonald; B W Pearson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1980-10

8.  Epistaxis: efficacy of arterial ligation and long-term outcome.

Authors:  P Spafford; J S Durham
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1992-08

Review 9.  Epistaxis: a comparison of treatment.

Authors:  C B Shaw; M K Wax; S J Wetmore
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Bilateral facial nerve paralysis following arterial embolization for epistaxis.

Authors:  R Metson; D G Hanson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.