| Literature DB >> 24303435 |
Behrooz Gandomi1, Mohammad Hosein Arzaghi, Bijan Khademi, Mohammad Rafatbakhsh.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Epistaxis is one of the most common medical emergencies, making the management of posterior epistaxis a challenging problem for the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeon. In the cases of conservative management failure, ligation of the major arteries or percutaneous embolization of the maxillary artery is performed routinely in most units, but rates of failure and complications are high. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery (SPA) cauterization in patients with refractory posterior epistaxis.Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery cauterization; Epistaxis; SPA electrocoagulation technique
Year: 2013 PMID: 24303435 PMCID: PMC3846233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 2251-7251
Average Length of Hospital Stay and Follow-Up Period
| Parameter | Mean | Range |
|---|---|---|
|
| 45.3 | 17–78 |
|
| 6.2 | 2–10 |
|
| 1.2 | 1–2 |
|
| 1.6 | 1–3 |
Fig 1Injection into the pterygopalatine fossa through greater palatine foramen
Fig 2Sphenopalatine artery
Fig 3Age range of patients
Epistaxis Recurrence
| Timing | Patients (n) | Timepoints |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0 | - |
|
| 3 | Days 7, 8, 10 |
|
| 1 | 2 months |
Success rate of SPA ligation in other studies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdel Kader (1) | 45 | Up to 36 | 87 | 0 |
| El Guindy (8) | 9 | 3–6 | 100 | 0 |
| Holzmann (9) | 75 | 2–18 | 96 | 16 |
| O'Flynn (10) | 12 | 9 | 88 | 0 |
| Rasmussen (11) | 16 | Up to 3 | 83 | 0 |
| Rockey (12) | 17 (1+AEA) | Up to 1 | 70 | - |
| Rudert (13) | 31 | 23 | 97 | 0 |
| Sharp (14) | 11 | 9 | 100 | 0 |
| Simpson (15) | 14 | 4–36 | 93 | 7 |
| Snyderman (16) | 42 | 1–28 | 88 | 53 |
| Srinivasan (17) | 10 (4+AEA) | 10 | 90 | 0 |
| Tsai (18) | 9 | 2–14 | 95 | 0 |
| Wiorowski (19) | 10 (4+AEA) | 1 | 90 | 0 |
| Wormald (20) | 13 | 5–28 | 92 | 0 |
AEA: Anterior ethmiodal artery