Literature DB >> 8332429

The spatial signal for saccadic eye movements emphasizes visual boundaries.

J M Findlay1, D Brogan, M G Wenban-Smith.   

Abstract

By investigating the visual processing involved when saccades are made to newly appearing targets, we show that this processing is significantly nonlinear and that texture boundary information predominates. We used the global, or center-of-gravity, effect whereby a saccadic eye movement directed to a target consisting of a pair of elements has an amplitude intermediate between that of saccades directed to the individual elements. We measured the effect using target elements with different visual characteristics, including phase-reversal checkerboard targets that had the same space-average luminance as the background. The contribution to the center-of-gravity calculation was used to measure relative salience. We found that positive and negative contrast elements contribute almost equal weightings. Thus, salience, assessed in this way, is a highly nonlinear function of luminance. The salience of checkerboard targets was found to decrease as check size was decreased and increase as the overall size of the target was increased. Checkerboards with an empty center were as effective as were full checkerboards, showing the importance of boundaries in the salience signal.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8332429     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

Review 1.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model.

Authors:  M C Morrone; D C Burr
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-12-22

3.  The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: implications for "center-of-gravity" tendencies.

Authors:  P Y He; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons.

Authors:  J Allman; F Miezin; E McGuinness
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Visual illusions without low spatial frequencies.

Authors:  C R Carlson; J R Moeller; C H Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  "Where" and "what" in vision.

Authors:  D Sagi; B Julesz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Nonlinearity in the perception of form.

Authors:  R Shapley; J Gordon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-01

8.  Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system.

Authors:  Z Kapoula
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J M Findlay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes.

Authors:  D J Morrison; P G Schyns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling; A Bäckström; J R Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effect of retinal and/or extra-retinal information on age in memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  M R Burke; J B Clarke; J Hedley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of Kanizsa's compression illusion on reflexive saccades.

Authors:  Paul C Knox
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Jianguo Lü; Hermann J Müller; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.

Authors:  David Aagten-Murphy; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Negative priming for target selection with saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Tim Donovan; Trevor J Crawford; Damien Litchfield
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The global effect for antisaccades.

Authors:  Jayalakshmi Viswanathan; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual working memory modulates within-object metrics of saccade landing position.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Saccade accuracy as an indicator of the competition between functional asymmetries in vision.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.