Literature DB >> 31932866

Saccade accuracy as an indicator of the competition between functional asymmetries in vision.

Jérôme Tagu1,2, Karine Doré-Mazars3, Dorine Vergilino-Perez3,4.   

Abstract

Hemispheric specialization refers to the fact that cerebral hemispheres are not equivalent and that cognitive processes are lateralized in the brain. Although the potential links between handedness and the left hemisphere specialization for language have been widely studied, little attention has been paid to other motor preferences, such as eye dominance, that also are lateralized in the brain. For example, saccadic accuracy is higher in the hemifield contralateral to the dominant eye compared to the ipsilateral hemifield. Saccade accuracy is, however, also known to be sensitive to other functional asymmetries, such as the lateralization of visuo-spatial attention in the right hemisphere of the brain. Using a global effect paradigm in three different saccade latency ranges, we here propose to use saccade accuracy as an indicator of visual functional asymmetries. We show that for the shortest latencies, saccade accuracy is higher in the left than in the right visual hemifield, which could be due to the lateralization of visuo-spatial attention in the right hemisphere. For the longest latencies, however, saccade accuracy is higher toward the right than the left hemifield, probably due to the lateralization of local and global processing in the left and right hemispheres, respectively. These results could have a major impact on studies designed to measure the degree of lateralization of individuals. We here discuss both the theoretical and clinical contributions of these results.

Keywords:  Asymmetries; Distractor; Global effect; Hemispheric specialization; Saccadic accuracy; Saccadic eye movements

Year:  2020        PMID: 31932866     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05717-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Right and left visual cortex areas in healthy subjects with right- and left-eye dominance.

Authors:  A Riza Erdoğan; Mete Ozdikici; M Dumlu Aydin; Omer Aktaş; Senol Dane
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.292

3.  The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength.

Authors:  Laure Zago; Laurent Petit; Emmanuel Mellet; Gaël Jobard; Fabrice Crivello; Marc Joliot; Bernard Mazoyer; Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Naso-temporal asymmetry for signals invisible to the retinotectal pathway.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Thomas Sterling; Robert D Rafal; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Asymmetry in visual information processing depends on the strength of eye dominance.

Authors:  Romain Chaumillon; Nadia Alahyane; Patrice Senot; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Jean Blouin; Karine Doré-Mazars; Alain Guillaume; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Quantifying eye dominance strength - New insights into the neurophysiological bases of saccadic asymmetries.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Binocular co-ordination of human horizontal saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; C J Erkelens; R M Steinman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance.

Authors:  M Seyal; S Sato; B G White; R J Porter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-11

9.  A dissociation between spatial and identity matching in callosotomy patients.

Authors:  P M Corballis; M G Funnell; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Shifting attentional priorities: control of spatial attention through hemispheric competition.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contrasting attentional biases in a saccadic choice task.

Authors:  Ómar I Jóhannesson; Árni Kristjánsson; Jérôme Tagu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.