Literature DB >> 17051374

The effect of Kanizsa's compression illusion on reflexive saccades.

Paul C Knox1.   

Abstract

When a horizontal line is occluded by a surface, subjects misperceive the line as being compressed, that is, they perceive it to be shorter than it really is (Kanizsa's compression illusion). The size of the compression effect usually ranges from approximately 5 to 10%. In this experiment, subjects executed reflexive saccades from one end of a line, presented at fixation, to the other end, with and without an occluding square. Saccade amplitude was reduced in all subjects in the presence of an occluding square; the effect averaged about 5%. These results demonstrate that saccade amplitude is modified by the Kanizsa compression illusion. They provide further evidence that reflexive saccade amplitude can be altered by illusion inducing stimuli, to the same degree as perceptual effects, even in circumstances in which other motor behaviours resist the illusion. They are difficult to reconcile with any strong version of the "two visual systems hypothesis".

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17051374     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0741-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades.

Authors:  D Melcher; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Control of voluntary and reflexive saccades.

Authors:  R Walker; D G Walker; M Husain; C Kennard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  Why are saccades influenced by the Brentano illusion?

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The spatial signal for saccadic eye movements emphasizes visual boundaries.

Authors:  J M Findlay; D Brogan; M G Wenban-Smith
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-06

8.  Saccadic programming and perceived location.

Authors:  E Wong; A Mack
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1981-08

9.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J M Findlay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  A dissociation of perception and action in normal human observers: the effect of temporal-delay.

Authors:  Mark F Bradshaw; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  2 in total

1.  When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades.

Authors:  Paul C Knox; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades is modulated by spatial predictability and saccadic latency.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.