| Literature DB >> 1592652 |
M King1.
Abstract
A considerable body of evidence suggests that the deleterious meiotic effects of pericentric inversions in F1 hybrids can be overcome by changes in chiasma location and various means of non-homologous pairing. Such overriding mechanisms may render pericentric inversions benign and increase the likelihood of their fixation in population isolates. It has been argued that overriding mechanisms of this type negate the involvement of pericentric inversions as reproductive isolating mechanisms in speciation. It is suggested, however, that the involvement of pericentric inversions in speciation should be considered on two levels. First, that by reducing meiotic effects in F1 hybrids, overriding mechanisms facilitate the fixation of pericentric inversions. Secondly, when contact hybridization occurs between the chromosomally derived and parental populations second-level effects may be encountered. That is, the recombinational effects of pericentric inversion differences on coadapted gene complexes (sensu Brncic, 1954, Shaw & Coates, 1983) enforce profound inviability barriers in F2 and backcross matings. In this way, multiple pericentric inversions may act as significant post-mating isolating mechanisms, whereas individual inversions with less significant second-level effects may not.Mesh:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1592652 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1992.63
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821