Literature DB >> 8325411

A comparison of flash electroretinograms recorded from Burian Allen, JET, C-glide, gold foil, DTL and skin electrodes.

L Esakowitz1, A Kriss, F Shawkat.   

Abstract

Single flash scotopic and photopic electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from the same subjects using six types of corneal electrode, in order to assess their relative effectiveness. In addition, the ERG from a lower eyelid skin electrode was recorded to give an indication of the degree of attenuation to be expected from a skin electrode. On average, the scotopic ERG recorded from the Burian Allen electrode measured 471 microV (100%), and relative to this the b-waves recorded using other electrodes were as follows: JET (89%), C-glide (77%), gold foil (56%), DTL (46%) and skin (12%). Under photopic conditions the order was the same and the interelectrode proportions similar. The b-wave amplitude recorded using the Burian Allen electrode was 125 microV (100%), and with other electrodes was as follows: JET (93%), C-glide (78%), gold foil (60%), DTL (60%) and skin (14%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8325411     DOI: 10.1038/eye.1993.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  24 in total

1.  Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.

Authors:  D Keating; S Parks; A Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Alteration of electroretinographic recordings when performed under sedation or halogenate anesthesia in a pediatric population.

Authors:  François Tremblay; Joan E Parkinson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.

Authors:  Hang Yin; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Electrically evoked electroretinograms and pupil responses in Argus II retinal implant wearers.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Michael P Barry; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Multi-centre variability of ISCEV standard ERGs in two normal adults.

Authors:  R Hamilton; A Al Abdlseaed; J Healey; M M Neveu; L Brown; D Keating; V A McBain; D Sculfor; D A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good?

Authors:  Jungeun Woo; Suna Jung; Mathieu Gauvin; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Standardized full-field electroretinography in rabbits.

Authors:  Karin Gjörloff; Sten Andréasson; Berndt Ehinger
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Comparison of guinea pig electroretinograms measured with bipolar corneal and unipolar intravitreal electrodes.

Authors:  B V Bui; H S Weisinger; A J Sinclair; A J Vingrys
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Obtaining a contact lens acquired electroretinogram in the presence of topical anesthetic hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Joan Parkinson; Francois Tremblay
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.