Literature DB >> 8320317

Effects of culture media on detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci by disc diffusion methods.

L M Milne1, M R Crow, A G Emptage, J B Selkon.   

Abstract

AIMS: To test 10 culture media for their ability to detect resistance and sensitivity of staphylococci to methicillin by disc diffusion.
METHODS: Fifty strains of Staphylococcus aureus and 135 strains of coagulase negative staphylococci were tested using Columbia, Diagnostic Sensitivity Test, Mueller Hinton, Sensitest and Iso-sensitest agars with and without 5% added sodium chloride. Cultures were examined after 18 and 40 hours of incubation. The diameter of the zone and its characteristics were recorded and these media were assessed for their ability to produce clear, readable zones of inhibition. Changes in the variables which determined resistance were investigated. Results were analysed allowing a zone diameter reduction of 8 mm and 10 mm compared with the control in addition to the standard 6 mm.
RESULTS: Columbia agar with added sodium chloride supported the growth of all strains, detected the highest number of resistant strains, and was the easiest to read. Resistance was detected after 18 hours in most resistant strains, but some required 40 hours of incubation. There was poor agreement, however, on this medium (63-94%) between disc diffusion and the reference MIC method for sensitive strains. Allowing a greater reduction in zone size resulted in more agreement with sensitive strains but with consequently lowered detection of resistant strains. The other media showed some growth failures and more zones that were difficult to read. More resistance was detected when incubation was prolonged to 40 hours but this was consistently less than on Columbia agar with added salt.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the media detected all of the resistant strains. Columbia agar with added salt was the most satisfactory medium in this respect, but it misidentified up to 37% of the sensitive strains as resistant. Methicillin susceptibility testing by disc diffusion testing is unreliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8320317      PMCID: PMC501243          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.46.5.394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  18 in total

1.  NATURALLY OCCURING METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI.

Authors:  M BARBER
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1964-05

2.  Evaluation of laboratory tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  P E Coudron; D L Jones; H P Dalton; G L Archer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Methicillin susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus on media containing five percent sodium chloride.

Authors:  D F Brown; V S Yates
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  The reliability of methicillin sensitivity tests on four culture media.

Authors:  D F Brown; D Kothari
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J H Hewitt; A W Coe; M T Parker
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1969-11-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  A screening test for the detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  G M Churcher
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The effect of temperature on resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin and some other antibioics.

Authors:  D I Annear
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1968-03-16       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  [Sensitivity to cephalosporins of coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant staphylococci. In vitro studies by different methods].

Authors:  J M Libert; D Colas des Francs
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1985-10

9.  Differences in antibiotic susceptibility between Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.

Authors:  J F Richardson; R R Marples
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  J M Hamilton-Miller; A Iliffe
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of disk diffusion, the E test, and detection of mecA for determination of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  J G Mulder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Comparison of screening methods to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  G Kampf; K Weist; S Swidsinski; M Kegel; H Rüden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Effects of culture media on detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci.

Authors:  R J Scott; J Morgan; J V Pether; J W Jones; J F Richardson; R H Bosley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  P Kohner; J Uhl; C Kolbert; D Persing; F Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Activity of the fourth generation cephalosporin FK-037 against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus under conditions maximizing PBP2' production.

Authors:  J M Hamilton-Miller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.