Literature DB >> 3639887

Evaluation of laboratory tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

P E Coudron, D L Jones, H P Dalton, G L Archer.   

Abstract

Few studies evaluating susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant staphylococci have included isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis, a known pathogen in many types of serious infections. We tested 175 S. epidermidis and 95 Staphylococcus aureus isolates to determine the most sensitive procedures for detecting methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Reference procedures included agar dilution with methicillin and 4% NaCl in the agar and broth microdilution with methicillin and 2% NaCl in cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth. After 24 h of incubation, the results from both methods correlated well and were within 1 log2 dilution for all isolates tested. Only one-half of all resistant isolates (92 of 183) were detected at 18 h by using the standard disk diffusion technique with 5-micrograms methicillin disks, and even fewer were detected with 10-micrograms methicillin disks and newly recommended zone-size criteria. However, the standard disk diffusion method with 4% NaCl in the agar increased the sensitivity and specificity for identification of the proper phenotype to greater than 92%. The spread plate and new spot techniques, both using agar with 4% NaCl, were also sensitive methods. Of 47 S. epidermidis isolates tested against oxacillin, 6 (13%) were oxacillin susceptible but methicillin resistant. Two automated systems, the Automicrobic system (Vitek Systems) and MicroScan (American MicroScan), as well as two broth screening systems available from Remel and Austin Biological Laboratories, failed to detect several resistant isolates, depending on the species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3639887      PMCID: PMC269025          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.764-769.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Positive Susceptibility-MIC card for detection of oxacillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; R T Lally; M N Ederer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the newly modified AutoMicrobic system gram-positive susceptibility-MIC card for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R T Lally; M N Ederer; B F Woolfrey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Variation in the abilities of automated, commercial, and reference methods to detect methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S L Hansen; P K Freedy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  New recommendations for disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility tests for methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) staphylococci.

Authors:  L K McDougal; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid recognition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by use of automated test systems.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J Redding; J E Johnson; V Holloway; R J Almeida
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Successful use of broth microdilution in susceptibility tests for methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) staphylococci.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; L K McDougal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Screening method for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S L Hansen; W A Pope
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Effect of the source of Mueller-Hinton agar and resistance frequency on the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J A Hindler; C B Inderlied
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Antimicrobial susceptibility and selection of resistance among Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates recovered from patients with infections of indwelling foreign devices.

Authors:  G L Archer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total
  33 in total

1.  Comparison of the Vitek gram-positive susceptibility 106 card, the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test, and mecA analysis for detecting oxacillin resistance in a geographically diverse collection of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  T Yamazumi; I Furuta; D J Diekema; M A Pfaller; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  The role of DNA amplification technology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Authors:  M Louie; L Louie; A E Simor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Detection of borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and differentiation from methicillin-resistant strains.

Authors:  H Liu; G Buescher; N Lewis; S Snyder; D Jungkind
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Characterization of resistance phenotype and cephalosporin activity in oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Mateos-Mora; C C Knapp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Genotypic identification of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  S C Predari; M Ligozzi; R Fontana
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  High levels of mecA DNA detected by a quantitative real-time PCR assay are associated with mortality in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Ya-Chi Ho; Shan-Chwen Chang; Su-Ru Lin; Wei-Kung Wang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Expert systems in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Trevor Winstanley; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  In vitro postantibiotic effect of daptomycin (LY146032) against Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  L M Bush; J A Boscia; M Wendeler; P G Pitsakis; D Kaye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Species identification and detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus blood isolates from neutropenic patients.

Authors:  M Venditti; S Santilli; P Petasecca Donati; A Micozzi; G Gentile; P Martino
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Inoculum effect on growth-delay time of oxacillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis exposed to cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime.

Authors:  E Yourassowsky; M P van der Linden; F Crokaert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.