Literature DB >> 448261

Matching-to-sample and oddity-from-sample in goldfish.

M Goldman, S Shapiro.   

Abstract

Acquisition of three-alternative simultaneous matching-to-sample and oddity-from-sample was investigated. Five goldfish were trained on matching and five on oddity for a minimum of 70 days. Subsequently, six of the fish were trained for 70 days on the other task. Acquisition was similar for oddity and matching. Correct responding started at about chance level and slowly increased to about 75%, with some animals performing at levels of over 85%. Acquisition of oddity following matching and matching following oddity began below chance. Maximal level of performance on second-task oddity was comparable to that on first-task matching. By contrast, the maximal levels of performance when matching was the second task were not as high as that of the same subjects at the end of first-task oddity. All fish exhibited strong color preferences during matching acquisition but not during oddity acquisition. The data demonstrated that goldfish can acquire a discrimination in which the stimulus associated with reinforcement depends on the identity of a second stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 448261      PMCID: PMC1332827          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  PHYLETIC DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1965-06

2.  Improved apparatus for the study of learning in fish.

Authors:  N LONGO; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1959-12

3.  Are theories of learning necessary?

Authors:  B F SKINNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The comparative analysis of learning.

Authors:  M E Bitterman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Acquisition and transfer of simultaneous oddity.

Authors:  R Berryman; W W Cumming; L R Cohen; D F Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1965-12
  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Rainbow trout discriminate 2-D photographs of conspecifics from distracting stimuli using an innovative operant conditioning device.

Authors:  Aude Kleiber; Claudiane Valotaire; Amélie Patinote; Pierre-Lô Sudan; Guillaume Gourmelen; Cécile Duret; Frédéric Borel; Leny Legoff; Manon Peyrafort; Vanessa Guesdon; Léa Lansade; Ludovic Calandreau; Violaine Colson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Cognitive abilities in Malawi cichlids (Pseudotropheus sp.): matching-to-sample and image/mirror-image discriminations.

Authors:  Stefanie Gierszewski; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Acquisition of matching-to-sample performance in rats using visual stimuli on nose keys.

Authors:  I H Iversen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Generalized Identity Matching to Sample after Multiple-Exemplar Training in Capuchin Monkeys.

Authors:  Ana Leda F Brino; Olavo F Galvão; Carlos R F Picanço; Romariz S Barros; Carlos B A Souza; Paulo R K Goulart; William J McIlvane
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2014-12

5.  Concept learning and the use of three common psychophysical paradigms in the archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Same/Different Abstract Concept Learning by Archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus perform above chance in a "matching-to-sample" experiment.

Authors:  Mélisande Aellen; Ulrike E Siebeck; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.