Literature DB >> 8315015

Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.

R Warren1, B Dwyer, M Plackett, K Pettit, N Rizvi, A M Baker.   

Abstract

The performances of a commercial nucleic acid hybridization test (Gen-Probe Pace 2 Chlamydia trachomatis) and two commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Abbott Chlamydiazyme and Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA) were evaluated against cell culture for the detection of C. trachomatis infection, with cervical swabs obtained from 1,037 women visiting a public sexual health center. The positivity rate by cell culture was 4.7%. Sensitivity and specificity for each test were as follows: Gen-Probe, 95.8 and 98.3%; Chlamydiazyme, 80.4 and 99.3%; Pharmacia EIA, 80.8 and 99.1%. Analysis of discrepant results with probe confirmation assay (Gen-Probe) and direct immunofluorescence (Syva Microtrak) revealed 12 cases of C. trachomatis infection for which culture was negative, resulting in the definition of a true-positive case as opposed to a culture positive. The positivity rate by true-positive definition was 5.9%, and sensitivity and specificity for each test were as follows: Gen-Probe, 96.7 and 99.6%; Chlamydiazyme, 77.5 and 100%; Pharmacia EIA, 77.0 and 100%; cell culture, 80.0 and 100%. We conclude that the Gen-Probe Pace 2 C. trachomatis test is a sensitive and specific alternative to cell culture for the detection of C. trachomatis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8315015      PMCID: PMC265603          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1663-1666.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Cross-reaction of clinical isolates of bacteria and yeasts with the chlamydiazyme test for chlamydial antigen, before and after use of a blocking reagent.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; M E Hick
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Rapid diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases--speed has a price.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L V Howard; P F Coleman; B J England; J E Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Chlamydiazyme test.

Authors:  M F Jones; T F Smith; A J Houglum; J E Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 system, direct fluorescent-antibody, and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens.

Authors:  P C Iwen; T M Blair; G L Woods
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  L S Magder; K C Klontz; L H Bush; R C Barnes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Chlamydiazyme plus blocking assay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  R D Mills; A Young; K Cain; T M Blair; M A Sitorius; G L Woods
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  K H Tjiam; B Y van Heijst; A van Zuuren; J H Wagenvoort; T van Joost; E Stolz; M F Michel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Microbiology Diagnosis of chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  K T Ripa
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Comparison of a DNA probe assay with culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M I Lees; D M Newnan; S M Garland
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  14 in total

1.  Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.

Authors:  W J Newhall; R E Johnson; S DeLisle; D Fine; A Hadgu; B Matsuda; D Osmond; J Campbell; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Dilution of samples collected and transported for Gen-Probe PACE 2 processing facilitates detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by Roche Amplicor PCR.

Authors:  D Liu; S L Jones; R Baird; J Pedersen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance characteristics of the Gen-Probe Probe Competition Assay used as a supplementary test for the Gen-Probe PACE 2 and 2C assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J L Beebe; T R Sharpton; S N Zanto; R S Steece; C Rogers; S L Mottice
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of enzyme immunoassay antigen detection, nucleic acid hybridization and PCR assay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  A Miettinen; P Vuorinen; T Varis; O Hällström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Improved performance of PACE 2 with modified collection system in combination with probe competition assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral specimens from males.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; W H Goessens; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; H G Niesters; E Stolz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The Use of Urine and Self-obtained Vaginal Swabs for the Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Authors:  Charlotte A. Gaydos; Anne M. Rompalo
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Evaluation of nucleic acid-based test (PACE 2C) for simultaneous detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  P C Iwen; R A Walker; K L Warren; D M Kelly; S H Hinrichs; J Linder
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for purified Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid.

Authors:  J G Kuipers; K Scharmann; J Wollenhaupt; E Nettelnbreker; S Hopf; H Zeidler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics.

Authors:  D V Ferrero; H N Meyers; D E Schultz; S A Willis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of Gen-Probe APTIMA-based Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis confirmatory testing in a metropolitan setting of high disease prevalence.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Vivian Boyd; Jolanta Czarnecka; Judy Griep; Brian Lund; Nancy Schaal; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.