Literature DB >> 1543154

Cross-reaction of clinical isolates of bacteria and yeasts with the chlamydiazyme test for chlamydial antigen, before and after use of a blocking reagent.

J A Kellogg1, J W Seiple, M E Hick.   

Abstract

More than 1,000 clinical isolates of bacteria and yeasts were identified, subcultured, and tested at 10(8) colony-forming units per milliliter with the Chlamydiazyme assay to determine the variety of microorganisms which could cause false-positive results for Chlamydial antigen. False-positive Chlamydiazyme results were obtained from 27 of 465 (5.8%) gram-negative, aerobic, or facultatively anaerobic bacterial isolates (including 8 of 39 [20.5%] Neisseria gonorrhoeae and 8 of 149 [5.4%] Escherichia coli isolates) and also from 2 of 46 (4.3%) Bacteroides species isolates. No false-positive results were obtained either from 373 gram-positive bacterial isolates or from 153 yeasts. Results from 21 of 29 (72.4%) isolates that cross-reacted with Chlamydiazyme antibodies were repeatedly positive, but all 21 were confirmed as false-positive results using a blocking antibody. When an initial Chlamydiazyme result is positive, repeating the test, with and without use of the blocking antibody, appears to be effective in identifying those results (more likely from poorly collected endocervical specimens) that are falsely positive, even in the presence of high concentrations of cross-reacting bacteria. Microscopic determination of endocervical specimen adequacy also may help to minimize false-positive (and false-negative) Chlamydiazyme results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1543154     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/97.3.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of urinary tract immunoglobulins for diagnosis of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J P Manzella; J W Seiple; S J Fortna; J W Cook; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.

Authors:  W J Newhall; R E Johnson; S DeLisle; D Fine; A Hadgu; B Matsuda; D Osmond; J Campbell; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Confirmation of positive results for chlamydial antigen by the Chlamydiazyme assay: value of repeated testing and a blocking antibody assay.

Authors:  M A Olsen; A R Sambol
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  R Warren; B Dwyer; M Plackett; K Pettit; N Rizvi; A M Baker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Chlamydia trachomatis and Genital Mycoplasmas: Pathogens with an Impact on Human Reproductive Health.

Authors:  Sunčanica Ljubin-Sternak; Tomislav Meštrović
Journal:  J Pathog       Date:  2014-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.