Literature DB >> 8309440

Iterative algebraic reconstruction algorithms for emission computed tomography: a unified framework and its application to positron emission tomography.

X L Xu1, J S Liow, S C Strother.   

Abstract

In this paper, a unified framework of iterative algebraic reconstruction for emission computed tomography (ECT) and its application to positron emission tomography (PET) is presented. The unified framework is based on an algebraic image restoration model and contains conventional iterative algebraic reconstruction algorithms: ART, SIRT, Landweber iteration (LWB), the generalized Landweber iteration (GLWB), the steepest descent method (STP), as well as iterative filtered backprojection (IFBP) reconstruction algorithms: Chang's method, Walters' method, and a modified iterative MAP. The framework provides an effective tool to systematically study conventional iterative algebraic algorithms and IFBP algorithms. Based on this framework, conventional iterative algebraic algorithms and IFBP algorithms are generalized. It is shown from the algebraic point of view that IFBP algorithms are not only excellent methods for correction of attenuation (either uniform or nonuniform) but are also good general iterative reconstruction algorithms (they can be applied to either attenuated or attenuation-free projections and converge very fast). The convergence behavior of iterative algebraic algorithms is discussed and insight is drawn into the fast convergence property of IFBP algorithms. A simulated PET system is used to evaluate IFBP algorithms and LWB in comparison with the maximum likelihood estimation via expectation maximization algorithm (MLE-EM) and the filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithm. The simulation results indicate that for both attenuation-free projection and attenuated projection cases IFBP algorithms have a significant computational advantage over LWB and MLE-EM, and have performance advantages over FBP in terms of contrast recovery and/or noise-to-signal ratios (NSRs) in regions of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8309440     DOI: 10.1118/1.596954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Unmatched projector/backprojector pairs in an iterative reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  G L Zeng; G T Gullberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A filtered backprojection MAP algorithm with nonuniform sampling and noise modeling.

Authors:  Gengsheng L Zeng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A filtered backprojection algorithm with characteristics of the iterative landweber algorithm.

Authors:  Gengsheng L Zeng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Preclinical imaging of mammary intraepithelial neoplasia with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Alexander D Borowsky; Jeffery P Gregg; Robert D Cardiff; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Comparison of a noise-weighted filtered backprojection algorithm with the Standard MLEM algorithm for poisson noise.

Authors:  Gengsheng L Zeng
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2013-10-24

Review 6.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  B M Tsui; E C Frey; K J LaCroix; D S Lalush; W H McCartney; M A King; G T Gullberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  A new iterative reconstruction technique for attenuation correction in high-resolution positron emission tomography.

Authors:  K Knesaurek; J Machac; S Vallabhajosula; M S Buchsbaum
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-06

8.  Filtered Backprojection Algorithm Can Outperform Iterative Maximum Likelihood Expectation-Maximization Algorithm.

Authors:  Gengsheng L Zeng
Journal:  Int J Imaging Syst Technol       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Deformable image registration of CT and truncated cone-beam CT for adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xin Zhen; Hao Yan; Linghong Zhou; Xun Jia; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.609

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.