Literature DB >> 8303446

Caudo-cephalad loading of pedicle screws: mechanisms of loosening and methods of augmentation.

M Law1, A F Tencer, P A Anderson.   

Abstract

The mechanism of failure and the effect of augmentation of single pedicle screws subjected to caudo-cephalad loads applied at the screw head were investigated. In each of 10 lumbar vertebrae, Steffee pedicle screws of appropriate diameter were placed in one pedicle. The cancellous bone of the contralateral pedicle was removed by curettage, a custom fabricated bushing was pressed by hand into the space, and a Steffee screw was inserted through the bushing and into the vertebral body. This arrangement was designed to transfer load directly from the pedicle screw to cortex, bypassing the cancellous bone of the pedicle. In a second experiment, a custom plate was mounted to the posterior surfaces of the articular facets allowing load transfer from the head of the screw directly to cortex. Caudo-cephalad loads were applied by a materials tester and toggle displacement (defined as the total caudo-cephalad movement of the screw under minimal load after loading through a complete cycle) was measured. Under peak loads of +199 N (caudal) and -224 N (cephalad), mean toggle at the screw head was 4.93 mm (standard deviation [SD] = 3.60 mm) for the screw alone and 4.96 mm (SD = 4.42 mm) for the screw augmented by the bushing. Screws without augmentation showed a characteristic pattern of loosening with the base of the pedicle acting as a fulcrum and a butterfly-shape void occurring in the vertebra and the pedicle where cancellous bone had been crushed. Problems with the bushing included poor fit, back-out, and split pedicles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8303446     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199312000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  21 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae.

Authors:  Wei Lei; Zixiang Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical analysis of differing pedicle screw insertion angles.

Authors:  William Sterba; Do-Gyoon Kim; David P Fyhrie; Yener N Yeni; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  A case of pedicle screw loosening treated by modified transpedicular screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Seung Won Park; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-01-31

4.  Pullout strength after expandable polymethylmethacrylate transpedicular screw augmentation for pedicle screw loosening.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Yong Jun Cho; Young-Baeg Kim; Seung Won Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-04-24

5.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The contribution of the cortical shell to pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Matthew Henry Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Darweesh Al-Khawaja; William Robert Walsh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

Review 7.  Pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spine: indications, limitations and technical aspects.

Authors:  S Hoppe; M J B Keel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Percutaneous consolidation of loosened spine arthrodesis under CT and fluoroscopy guidance by radiologists: a new useful technique.

Authors:  Nicolas Amoretti; Anne-Sophie Bertrand; Giacomo Gallo; Amandine Caudal; Francois Cornelis; Olivier Hauger; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Risk factors associated with the halo phenomenon after lumbar fusion surgery and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Sul-Gee Kim; Hwan-Mo Lee; Hak-Sun Kim; Eun-Su Moon; Jin-Oh Park; Nam-Heon Seol; Seong-Hwan Moon
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-06-30

10.  Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  S Becker; A Chavanne; R Spitaler; K Kropik; N Aigner; M Ogon; H Redl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.