S Hoppe1, M J B Keel2. 1. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. sven.hoppe@insel.ch. 2. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The need for spinal instrumented fusion in osteoporotic patients is rising. In this review, we try to give an overview of the current spectrum of pedicle screw augmentation techniques, safety aspects and indications. METHODS: Review of literature and discussion of indications, limitations and technical aspects. RESULTS: Various studies have shown higher failure rates in osteoporotic patients, most probably due to reduced bone quality and a poor bone-screw interface. Augmentation of pedicle screws with bone cement, such as polymethylmethacrylate or calcium based cements, is one valid option to enhance fixation if required. CONCLUSIONS: Crucial factors for success in the use of augmented screws are careful patient selection, a proper technique and choice of the ideal cement augmentation option.
PURPOSE: The need for spinal instrumented fusion in osteoporoticpatients is rising. In this review, we try to give an overview of the current spectrum of pedicle screw augmentation techniques, safety aspects and indications. METHODS: Review of literature and discussion of indications, limitations and technical aspects. RESULTS: Various studies have shown higher failure rates in osteoporoticpatients, most probably due to reduced bone quality and a poor bone-screw interface. Augmentation of pedicle screws with bone cement, such as polymethylmethacrylate or calcium based cements, is one valid option to enhance fixation if required. CONCLUSIONS: Crucial factors for success in the use of augmented screws are careful patient selection, a proper technique and choice of the ideal cement augmentation option.
Authors: Stewart D McLachlin; Khalid Al Saleh; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; Chris S Bailey; Cynthia E Dunning Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-05-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: W R Walsh; P Morberg; Y Yu; J L Yang; W Haggard; P C Sheath; M Svehla; W J M Bruce Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Christian Fölsch; Hans Goost; Jens Figiel; Jürgen R J Paletta; Wolfgang Schultz; Stefan Lakemeier Journal: Biomed Tech (Berl) Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 1.411
Authors: Rebecca A Kueny; Jan P Kolb; Wolfgang Lehmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Lennart Viezens; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Lehmann Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Lukas Weiser; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Lennart Viezens; Wolfgang Lehmann; Gerd Huber Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Werner Schmoelz; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Sven Schmidt; Angel R Piñera; Felix Tome-Bermejo; Javier M Duart; Marlies Bauer; Luis Álvarez Galovich Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Lennart Viezens; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Lehmann Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Lennart Viezens; Wolfgang Lehmann Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2020-04-21