Literature DB >> 20233850

Assessing the amount of unscheduled screening ("contamination") in the control arm of the UK "Age" Trial.

Nicola Kingston1, Iyamide Thomas, Louise Johns, Sue Moss.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The UK Age Trial of mammographic screening from age 40 has reported a nonsignificant 17% reduction in breast cancer mortality calculated on an "intention to treat" basis. High levels of ad hoc screening in the control arm could potentially have diluted the estimated effect.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the level of unscheduled mammography in the control arm of the UK Age Trial.
METHODS: Data were obtained from questionnaires sent to a random sample of 3,706 women at five centers in the control arm of this trial. Questions included in the Office for National Statistics Omnibus Surveys about the timing of and reasons for any breast screening provided comparable data. The overall response rate was 58.8%.
RESULTS: Overall, 24.9% (95% confidence interval, 23.0-26.8) of Age Trial controls responding reported ever having had a mammogram, 18.2% reported a mammogram for symptomatic reasons, and 8.4% reported unscheduled mammography. Overall, 4.0% and 1.8% of women reported symptomatic and unscheduled mammography, respectively, within the previous 12 months. Results from the Omnibus surveys were similar, 14.2% of women reported previous mammography for symptomatic reasons or follow-up after breast cancer and 6.8% reported unscheduled mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: The level of contamination due to mammographic screening in the control arm of the Age Trial was low and will have had a minimal effect on the estimated reduction in mortality from breast cancer. IMPACT: Estimating the extent of screening in the control arm in randomized trials of screening is important to inform interpretation of the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20233850      PMCID: PMC2852577          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  6 in total

1.  Contamination by opportunistic screening in the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  S Ciatto; M Zappa; A Villers; A Paez; S J Otto; A Auvinen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  J Cuzick; R Edwards; N Segnan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A trial to study the effect on breast cancer mortality of annual mammographic screening in women starting at age 40. Trial Steering Group.

Authors:  S Moss
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Suzie J Otto; Ingrid W van der Cruijsen; Michael K Liem; Ida J Korfage; Jan J Lous; Fritz H Schröder; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a perspective on criticisms.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-02-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Assessing the extent of contamination in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  V Goel; M M Cohen; P Kaufert; L MacWilliam
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.043

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparing CISNET Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Predictions to Observed Clinical Trial Results of Mammography Screening from Ages 40 to 49.

Authors:  Jeroen J van den Broek; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Hui Huang; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Elizabeth S Burnside; Cong Xu; Yisheng Li; Oguzhan Alagoz; Sandra J Lee; Natasha K Stout; Juhee Song; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Sylvia K Plevritis; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.