Literature DB >> 8278464

The effects of rigid fixation on craniofacial growth of rhesus monkeys.

M J Yaremchuk1, T G Fiala, F Barker, R Ragland.   

Abstract

A male infant rhesus monkey model was used to examine the growth effect on the craniofacial skeleton caused by osteotomy and three types of fixation: interfragmentary wiring, microplate and screw fixation, and "extensive" microplate and screw fixation. The animals (n = 12) were allowed to mature until cranial growth was at least 95 percent complete. Direct craniometric measurements were obtained and analyzed for differences in the three treated groups. A group of unoperated male animal skulls also was analyzed as controls (n = 5). A subtle visible and measurable restriction of growth in the operated area occurred in all treatment groups. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in only 4 of the 39 craniometric chords measured. Interfragmentary wiring showed fewer growth-restrictive effects than standard use of microfixation plates. Extensive use of rigid fixation devices caused the greatest degree of growth disturbance. Osteotomy and fixation in the infant rhesus monkey affect craniofacial growth, with the degree of growth restriction increasing with the amount of fixation hardware.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8278464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Choice of internal rigid fixation materials in the treatment of facial fractures.

Authors:  Mirko S Gilardino; Elliot Chen; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

2.  Biodegradable fixation for craniomaxillofacial surgery: a 10-year experience involving 761 operations and 745 patients.

Authors:  T A Turvey; W P Proffit; C Phillips
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Pediatric facial fractures and potential long-term growth disturbances.

Authors:  Jonathan Wheeler; John Phillips
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2011-03

4.  Polycaprolactone scaffold as targeted drug delivery system and cell attachment scaffold for postsurgical care of limb salvage.

Authors:  Bin Sheng Wong; Swee-Hin Teoh; Lifeng Kang
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Novel Zinc / Tungsten Carbide Nanocomposite as Bioabsorbable Implant.

Authors:  Zeyi Guan; Chase S Linsley; Injoo Hwang; Gongcheng Yao; Benjamin M Wu; Xiaochun Li
Journal:  Mater Lett       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 3.423

6.  Early experience with biodegradable implants in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Anastasios D Kanellopoulos; George N Nomikos; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Panayotis N Soucacos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The Efficacy of Bioabsorbable Mesh in Craniofacial Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Won Chul Choi; Hyun Gon Choi; Jee Nam Kim; Myung Cheol Lee; Dong Hyeok Shin; Soon Heum Kim; Cheol Keun Kim; Dong In Jo
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-09-23

8.  Clinical Evaluation of an Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-L-Lactide Osteoconductive Composite Device for the Internal Fixation of Maxillofacial Fractures.

Authors:  Shintaro Sukegawa; Takahiro Kanno; Naoki Katase; Akane Shibata; Yuka Takahashi; Yoshihiko Furuki
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.046

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.