Literature DB >> 8273538

Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant.

T Wellisz1.   

Abstract

The Medpor porous polyethylene implant is a highly stable and somewhat flexible porous alloplast that has been shown to exhibit rapid tissue ingrowth into its pores. A total of 116 Medpor implants were placed in 70 patients over a four-year period. Implants were used for the chin, malar area, nasal reconstruction, ear reconstruction, orbital reconstruction, and the correction of craniofacial contour deformities. Many of these implants were placed in areas long considered problematic such as areas of thin soft tissue coverage, extensive scarring, and severe facial burns. Nine complications occurred including seven exposures, all of which occurred in areas of minimal soft tissue coverage. Because of the rapid vascularization of the implants, only two implants were removed, both from the columella. On the basis of our results, it is felt that the Medpor implant is an excellent alternative to existing implant materials. The implant is easy to shape; it is strong yet somewhat flexible; it is remarkably stable; and it exhibits tissue ingrowth into its pores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8273538     DOI: 10.1007/bf00437109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  21 in total

Review 1.  Alloplastic augmentation of the anterior mandible.

Authors:  R S Flowers
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.017

2.  Porous hydroxyapatite as an onlay bone-graft substitute for maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  K E Salyer; C D Hall
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Reconstruction of the burned external ear using a Medpor porous polyethylene pivoting helix framework.

Authors:  T Wellisz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Characteristics of tissue growth into Proplast and porous polyethylene implants in bone.

Authors:  M Spector; S L Harmon; A Kreutner
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1979-09

Review 5.  Changing concepts in the management of secondary orbital deformities.

Authors:  M J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Subperiosteal approach as an improved concept for correction of the aging face.

Authors:  J M Psillakis; T O Rumley; A Camargos
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Craniofacial applications for the Medpor porous polyethylene flexblock implant.

Authors:  T Wellisz; W Dougherty; J Gross
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Porous polyethylene and proplast: their behavior in a bony implant bed.

Authors:  A Berghaus; G Mulch; M Handrock
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1984

9.  Use of Medpor porous polyethylene implants in 140 patients with facial fractures.

Authors:  J J Romano; N T Iliff; P N Manson
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Surface energies and the bone induction principle.

Authors:  C Eriksson
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1985-09
View more
  19 in total

1.  Porous high-density polyethylene in functional rhinoplasty: Excellent long-term aesthetic results and safety.

Authors:  Young Hyo Kim; Tae Young Jang
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Carrie Heike
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  HTR polymer facial implants: a five-year clinical experience.

Authors:  B L Eppley; A M Sadove; H Holmstrom; K E Kahnberg
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Co-culture of adipose-derived stem cells and chondrocytes on three-dimensionally printed bioscaffolds for craniofacial cartilage engineering.

Authors:  Robert J Morrison; Hassan B Nasser; Khaled N Kashlan; David A Zopf; Derek J Milner; Colleen L Flanangan; Matthew B Wheeler; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Utility of high density porous polyethylene implants in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Anshul Rai; Abhay Datarkar; Aakash Arora; D G Adwani
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  Scaffold-Assisted Artificial Hair Implantation in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Joshua K Au; Miguel Fernando Palma Diaz; Tara Aghaloo; Maie A St John
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  Porous high-density polyethylene in facial reconstruction and revision rhinoplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shabahang Mohammadi; Shadi Ghourchian; Farzad Izadi; Ahmad Daneshi; Aslan Ahmadi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Structural grafts and suture techniques in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Holger G Gassner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

9.  "Ride-on" technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Kapil S Agrawal; Manoj V Bachhav; Charudatta S Naik; Shikha Gupta; Anup V Sarda; Vyoma Desai
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2015 May-Aug

10.  Biochemical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Andrew K Pappa; Montserrat Caballero; Robert G Dennis; Matthew D Skancke; Roger J Narayan; John P Dahl; John A van Aalst
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.