Literature DB >> 24644395

Utility of high density porous polyethylene implants in maxillofacial surgery.

Anshul Rai1, Abhay Datarkar2, Aakash Arora3, D G Adwani4.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to determine the utility of high density porous polyethylene implants (HDPE) in a variety of facial skeletal deformities. Sixteen patients (age range 14-28 years) with facial deformities requiring skeletal defect reconstruction or augmentation, treated between January 2008 and December 2010. The follow-up of the patients ranged from 6 months to 2 years.The types of deformities and defects treated include: one patient each with hemifacial microsomia and nasal tip correction, two patients each with malar deformities and orbital floor reconstruction, three patients with paranasal deformities and mandibular hypoplasia and four patients with chin augmentation. A total of 24 implants were placed. The complications included infection and wound dehiscence in one patient. The implants were palpable extraorally in two patients. It is concluded that HDPE is an excellent alternative to autogenous grafts for facial skeletal augmentation. Its porous nature, excellent soft tissue growth and coverage are the advantages and disadvantages include its rigidity and sometimes it is palpable extraorally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alloplasts; Craniofacial reconstruction; Implants; Porous polyethylene

Year:  2013        PMID: 24644395      PMCID: PMC3955470          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-012-0459-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  14 in total

1.  Re: Flood et al. Randomized prospective study of the influence of steroids on postoperative eye-opening after exploration.

Authors:  S C Banerjee
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  Early tissue infiltrate in porous polyethylene implants into bone: a scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  M Spector; W R Flemming; B W Sauer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1975-09

Review 3.  Alloplastic augmentation of the anterior mandible.

Authors:  R S Flowers
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.017

4.  Long-term results after primary restoration of the orbital floor.

Authors:  J Friesenecker; R Dammer; M Moritz; H Niederdellmann
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Criteria for selective management of the orbital rim and floor in zygomatic complex and midface fractures.

Authors:  K A Shumrick; R C Kersten; D R Kulwin; C P Smith
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-04

6.  Orbital floor reconstruction with lyophilized dura.

Authors:  P D Waite; J T Clanton
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant.

Authors:  T Wellisz
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Reconstruction of the orbit following trauma.

Authors:  R H Mathog
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  The use of high-density polyethylene implants in facial deformities.

Authors:  J L Frodel; S Lee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-11

10.  Orbital reconstruction using porous polyethylene sheets.

Authors:  P A Rubin; J R Bilyk; J W Shore
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hemangiopericytoma of meningo-fronto-naso-orbito-maxillary complex.

Authors:  Bhavuk Vanza; Anshul Rai; Neha Khare; H S Verma
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-10-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.