Literature DB >> 8263822

Effects of noise and noise reduction processing on the operation of the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant processor.

M R Weiss1.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants, like other types of auditory sensory aids, become increasingly ineffective with increasing ambient noise levels. One method of signal processing to reduce additive random wideband noise, the INTEL method, has been used to good effect as an input preprocessor for the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. The implant's own signal processor estimates and encodes pitch frequency and the frequencies of Formants 1 and 2. The study reported here shows that additive noise results in substantial deviations in formant frequency estimates from those that would be observed in the absence of noise. When noisy speech is preprocessed by the INTEL method to reduce noise intensity, the deviations in the frequency estimates for Formant 2 are substantially reduced.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8263822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  9 in total

1.  Multi-microphone adaptive noise reduction strategies for coordinated stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Subspace algorithms for noise reduction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Arthur Lobo; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  On the importance of preserving the harmonics and neighboring partials prior to vocoder processing: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Using blind source separation techniques to improve speech recognition in bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Lorraine A Delhorne; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech enhancement for cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Dongmei Wang; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Behnam Azimi; Yi Hu; David R Friedland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-23

9.  The Effects of Auditory Contrast Tuning upon Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Nathan J Killian; Paul V Watkins; Lisa S Davidson; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.