Literature DB >> 8255697

Four questions of time to contact: a critical examination of research on interceptive timing.

J R Tresilian1.   

Abstract

Four questions concerning the use and perception of time to contact, tc, are identified. (i) Is tc information used in the timing of interceptive actions? (ii) If so, what control strategies are used? (iii) What are the perceptual sources of tc information and which of them do people use? (iv) How is the information extracted by the perceptual systems? Research relevant to these questions is reviewed and analysed. In connection with question (i), theoretical work on the special case of catching a moving object is analysed. It is concluded that treatments of catching which involve the use of tc information provide the best account of timing. In connection with question (ii), two types of control strategy suggested in the literature are identified: an intermittent strategy and a continuous strategy. Evidence for a continuous strategy is reconsidered and shown to be at least as well if not better accounted for by an intermittent strategy. Other empirical evidence for intermittent control is also discussed. In connection with question (iii) a simple unifying method is outlined with which all tc information so far presented in the literature can be derived, and examples are given. The viability of various types of information as sources of tc is examined by considering the errors which would result from their use. Finally, in connection with question (iv) the role of 'looming detectors' in the extraction of tc information is considered. These are frequently proposed as mechanisms for extracting the tc information provided by Lee's optic variable, tau. The analysis provided indicates that, despite the existence of a well-known and popular theory, due mainly to Lee, about how interceptive actions are timed, very little is actually known about perceptual timing. It is not yet certain whether tc information is used in interceptive timing tasks, what kinds of control strategies are involved, what sources of information people use to time their actions, or what perceptual processing is involved in the extraction of tc information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8255697     DOI: 10.1068/p220653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

Review 1.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Extrapolation of vertical target motion through a brief visual occlusion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Marco Iosa; Vincenzo Maffei; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perceiving motion and rigid structure from optic flow: a combined weak-perspective and polar-perspective approach.

Authors:  M Lind
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

5.  Time-to-passage judgments in nonconstant optical flow fields.

Authors:  M K Kaiser; H Hecht
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

6.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks.

Authors:  J R Tresilian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

7.  Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction.

Authors:  Marta Russo; Benedetta Cesqui; Barbara La Scaleia; Francesca Ceccarelli; Antonella Maselli; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action.

Authors:  Björn Jörges; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Intercepting accelerated moving targets: effects of practice on movement performance.

Authors:  João V A P Fialho; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Gaze movements and spatial working memory in collision avoidance: a traffic intersection task.

Authors:  Gregor Hardiess; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; Hanspeter A Mallot
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.