Literature DB >> 28768737

Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: evidence for spatial prediction.

Marta Russo1, Benedetta Cesqui2,3, Barbara La Scaleia3, Francesca Ceccarelli2, Antonella Maselli3, Alessandro Moscatelli2,3, Myrka Zago3, Francesco Lacquaniti2,3,4, Andrea d'Avella3,5.   

Abstract

To accurately time motor responses when intercepting falling balls we rely on an internal model of gravity. However, whether and how such a model is also used to estimate the spatial location of interception is still an open question. Here we addressed this issue by asking 25 participants to intercept balls projected from a fixed location 6 m in front of them and approaching along trajectories with different arrival locations, flight durations, and gravity accelerations (0g and 1g). The trajectories were displayed in an immersive virtual reality system with a wide field of view. Participants intercepted approaching balls with a racket, and they were free to choose the time and place of interception. We found that participants often achieved a better performance with 1g than 0g balls. Moreover, the interception points were distributed along the direction of a 1g path for both 1g and 0g balls. In the latter case, interceptions tended to cluster on the upper half of the racket, indicating that participants aimed at a lower position than the actual 0g path. These results suggest that an internal model of gravity was probably used in predicting the interception locations. However, we found that the difference in performance between 1g and 0g balls was modulated by flight duration, the difference being larger for faster balls. In addition, the number of peaks in the hand speed profiles increased with flight duration, suggesting that visual information was used to adjust the motor response, correcting the prediction to some extent.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here we show that an internal model of gravity plays a key role in predicting where to intercept a fast-moving target. Participants also assumed an accelerated motion when intercepting balls approaching in a virtual environment at constant velocity. We also show that the role of visual information in guiding interceptive movement increases when more time is available.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gravity; interception; internal model; virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28768737      PMCID: PMC5646193          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00025.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  55 in total

1.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Maffei; Marco Iosa; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual processing of optic acceleration.

Authors:  P Werkhoven; H P Snippe; A Toet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A dynamical neural network for hitting an approaching object.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Simone R Caljouw; Peper E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 4.  Internal models and prediction of visual gravitational motion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets.

Authors:  K S Arun; T S Huang; S D Blostein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  How people achieve their amazing temporal precision in interception.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action.

Authors:  Björn Jörges; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

1.  Interception of virtual throws reveals predictive skills based on the visual processing of throwing kinematics.

Authors:  Antonella Maselli; Paolo De Pasquale; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-24

2.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Rolling Motion Along an Incline: Visual Sensitivity to the Relation Between Acceleration and Slope.

Authors:  Francesca Ceccarelli; Barbara La Scaleia; Marta Russo; Benedetta Cesqui; Silvio Gravano; Maura Mezzetti; Alessandro Moscatelli; Andrea d'Avella; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Speed change discrimination for motion in depth using constant world and retinal speeds.

Authors:  Abigail R I Lee; Justin M Ales; Julie M Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Static internal representation of dynamic situations reveals time compaction in human cognition.

Authors:  José Antonio Villacorta-Atienza; Carlos Calvo Tapia; Sergio Díez-Hermano; Abel Sánchez-Jiménez; Sergey Lobov; Nadia Krilova; Antonio Murciano; Gabriela E López-Tolsa; Ricardo Pellón; Valeri A Makarov
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 10.479

6.  Perceptual judgments of duration of parabolic motions.

Authors:  Björn Jörges; Barbara La Scaleia; Joan López-Moliner; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Watching the Effects of Gravity. Vestibular Cortex and the Neural Representation of "Visual" Gravity.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Iole Indovina; Myrka Zago; Elena Daprati; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01

8.  Motion-in-depth effects on interceptive timing errors in an immersive environment.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Mechanical effects of canes on standing posture: beyond perceptual information.

Authors:  Marta Russo; Jongwoo Lee; Neville Hogan; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 5.208

10.  Motor control beyond reach-how humans hit a target with a whip.

Authors:  Aleksei Krotov; Marta Russo; Moses Nah; Neville Hogan; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.653

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.