Literature DB >> 8253966

Two percent sodium chloride is required for susceptibility testing of staphylococci with oxacillin when using agar-based dilution methods.

M B Huang1, T E Gay, C N Baker, S N Banerjee, F C Tenover.   

Abstract

The need to add NaCl to agar media to ensure accuracy of results when testing staphylococci with oxacillin was investigated. The results of four antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods (agar and broth dilution, E test, and disk diffusion) in which the growth medium contained 0, 2, 4, or 5% NaCl were compared with the results of a hybridization assay using a mec gene probe. We tested 223 strains of staphylococci, 128 of which were mec gene positive. A total of 7 of the 128 positive strains were coagulase-negative staphylococci with 24-h oxacillin MICs of < or = 2 micrograms/ml. Ninety-five isolates were mec gene negative, including seven strains of Staphylococcus aureus with oxacillin MICs of > or = 4 micrograms/ml. The oxacillin MICs for mec gene-positive, oxacillin-resistant strains of staphylococci increased two- to fourfold with the addition of NaCl to the test medium, while the MICs for mec gene-negative strains did not change in the presence of added salt. Very major error rates for the agar dilution and E test methods in the absence of salt ranged from 18.2 to 20.2%. Major error rates for mec gene-negative S. aureus isolates were > 17% for all test methods when 4 or 5% NaCl was added to the test medium. The addition of 2% NaCl to Mueller-Hinton agar for testing of oxacillin resulted in very major error rates of < 1% for the agar dilution and E test methods although the major error rates for the two methods with added NaCl were 8.5 and 6.9%, respectively. The disk diffusion test did not perform well in this study, showing essential error rates of > or = 18.3%. We recommended the addition of 2% NaC1 to Mueller-Hinton agar when testing staphylococci with oxacillin by either the agar dilution or E test method. NaC1 should not be added for the disk diffusion test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8253966      PMCID: PMC265975          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2683-2688.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  26 in total

1.  Detection of borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and differentiation from methicillin-resistant strains.

Authors:  H Liu; G Buescher; N Lewis; S Snyder; D Jungkind
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Cloning and expression of methicillin resistance from Staphylococcus epidermidis in Staphylococcus carnosus.

Authors:  W Tesch; A Strässle; B Berger-Bächi; D O'Hara; P Reynolds; F H Kayser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A screening test for the detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  G M Churcher
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Additional DNA in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and molecular cloning of mec-specific DNA.

Authors:  W D Beck; B Berger-Bächi; F H Kayser
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The role of beta-lactamase in staphylococcal resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins.

Authors:  L K McDougal; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Reliability of the microdilution technic for detection of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Successful use of broth microdilution in susceptibility tests for methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) staphylococci.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; L K McDougal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparative analysis of conjugative plasmids mediating gentamicin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R V Goering; E A Ruff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Reliability of high-content disks and modified broth dilution tests for detecting staphylococcal resistance to the penicillinase-resistant penicillins.

Authors:  A L Barry; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Expression of methicillin resistance in heterogeneous strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B J Hartman; A Tomasz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  25 in total

1.  Methods for improved detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  F C Tenover; R N Jones; J M Swenson; B Zimmer; S McAllister; J H Jorgensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  F Martineau; F J Picard; N Lansac; C Ménard; P H Roy; M Ouellette; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Evaluation of Vitek GPS-SA card for testing of oxacillin against borderline-susceptible staphylococci that lack mec.

Authors:  C C Knapp; M D Ludwig; J A Washington; H F Chambers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of screening methods to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  G Kampf; K Weist; S Swidsinski; M Kegel; H Rüden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Cavassini; A Wenger; K Jaton; D S Blanc; J Bille
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in a Canadian hospital.

Authors:  O Hammerberg; H Bialkowska-Hobrzanska; D Gregson; K McGhie; R Behme
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Comparison of phenotypic methods and DNA hybridization for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P Richard; M Meyran; E Carpentier; A Thabaut; H B Drugeon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of PCR detection of mecA with standard susceptibility testing methods to determine methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  M K York; L Gibbs; F Chehab; G F Brooks
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Branched-DNA assay for detection of the mecA gene in oxacillin-resistant and oxacillin-sensitive staphylococci.

Authors:  C P Kolbert; J Arruda; P Varga-Delmore; X Zheng; M Lewis; J Kolberg; D H Persing
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Rapid detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci by commercially available fluorescence test.

Authors:  M Ieven; H Jansens; D Ursi; J Verhoeven; H Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.