Literature DB >> 12850677

Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Mikael Johansson1, A Thune, A Blomqvist, L Nelvin, L Lundell.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to determine whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed as an early or a delayed operation in patients with acute cholecystitis. After diagnostic workup, patients were randomized to one of two groups: (1) early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (i.e., within 7 days after onset of symptoms) or (2) initial conservative treatment followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy 6 to 8 weeks later. Seventy-four patients were placed in the early-operation group, and 71 patients were assigned to the delayed-operation strategy. There was no significant difference in conversion rates (early 31% vs. delayed 29%), operating times (early 98 [range 30 to 355] minutes vs. delayed 100 [45 to 280] minutes), or complications. Failure with the conservative treatment strategy was noted in 26% of these patients. The total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early group (5 [range 3 to 63] days) vs. the delayed group (8 [range 4 to 50] days; P<0.05). Despite a high conversion rate, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy offered significant advantages in the management of acute cholecystitis compared to a conservative strategy. The greatest advantage was a reduced total hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12850677     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(03)00065-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  17 in total

1.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L W Way
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the procedure of choice for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  S M Wiesen; S W Unger; J S Barkin; D S Edelman; J S Scott; H M Unger
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  C M Lo; C L Liu; E C Lai; S T Fan; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Early versus delayed cholecystectomy: the effect of a change in management.

Authors:  W Van der Linden; G Edlund
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error?

Authors:  D R Flum; T Koepsell; P Heagerty; M Sinanan; E P Dellinger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-11

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder.

Authors:  M R Cox; T G Wilson; A J Luck; P L Jeans; R T Padbury; J Toouli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  D W Rattner; C Ferguson; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis.

Authors:  T Kiviluoto; J Sirén; P Luukkonen; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J H Peters; G D Gibbons; J T Innes; K E Nichols; M E Front; S R Roby; E C Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  70 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early cholecystectomy after acute admission with cholecystitis: how much work?

Authors:  Michael R Stephens; Ceri Beaton; Adrian C Steger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy increases the total hospital stay compared to an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Benjamin Menahem; Andrea Mulliri; Audrey Fohlen; Lydia Guittet; Arnaud Alves; Jean Lubrano
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Satoru Shikata; Yoshinori Noguchi; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Laparoscopic surgery--15 years after clinical introduction.

Authors:  Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Recommendations for intra-abdominal infections consensus report.

Authors:  Vildan Avkan-Oğuz; Nurcan Baykam; Selman Sökmen; Rahmet Güner; Fatih Agalar; Emine Alp; Ahmet Doğrul; Özge Turhan; Canan Ağalar; Behice Kurtaran; İbrahim Ethem Geçim; Reşat Özaras; Gürdal Yılmaz; Ayhan Akbulut; İftihar Koksal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-12-01

9.  Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Ji Hun Kim; Jeong Woon Kim; In Ho Jeong; Tae Yong Choi; Byung Moo Yoo; Jin Hong Kim; Myung Wook Kim; Wook Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy is safe and effective option for acute calculous cholecystitis in select group of high-risk patients.

Authors:  M Bala; I Mizrahi; H Mazeh; J Yuval; A Eid; G Almogy
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.