Literature DB >> 8239636

The rat's preference for sucrose, polycose and their mixtures.

K Ackroff1, L Manza, A Sclafani.   

Abstract

In one-bottle tests (30 min/day) food-deprived rats consumed significantly more 2% Polycose than 2% sucrose, and yet in two-bottle choice tests they did not consistently prefer Polycose to sucrose. A previously proposed explanation for this effect is that rats habituate, or develop oral satiety, to the flavor of sucrose more rapidly than to Polycose, and sucrose satiety generalizes to Polycose. This idea was not supported by the results of sequential 15-min one-bottle tests: the intake of 2% sucrose did not suppress subsequent Polycose intake. Instead, the failure of rats to consistently prefer Polycose to sucrose was attributed to the development of a drinking pattern that allowed the rats to mix the two solutions in their mouths. When the drinking spouts were nearby, the rats consumed similar amounts of sucrose and Polycose, but when the spouts were far apart, they consumed more Polycose than sucrose. That rats prefer the combined flavor of sucrose and Polycose to either flavor alone was confirmed in subsequent tests. Rats strongly preferred a 1% sucrose + 1% Polycose mixture to a plain 2% sucrose or 2% Polycose solution. They also preferred sucrose-Polycose mixtures to plain solutions at concentrations ranging up to 32%. The potency of the sucrose-Polycose mixture is presumably related to the activation of separate "sweet" and "polysaccharide" taste channels in the rat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8239636     DOI: 10.1006/appe.1993.1037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  12 in total

1.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Potentiation of taste and extract stimuli in conditioned flavor preference learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Capaldi; Gregory J Privitera
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-03-02

4.  Behavioral evidence for a glucose polymer taste receptor that is independent of the T1R2+3 heterodimer in a mouse model.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; Tiffany R Aleman; Hillary T Ellis; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Rats' preferences for high fructose corn syrup vs. sucrose and sugar mixtures.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-01-12

7.  Nucleus accumbens core dopamine signaling tracks the need-based motivational value of food-paired cues.

Authors:  Tara J Aitken; Venuz Y Greenfield; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 5.372

8.  Polycose taste pre-exposure fails to influence behavioral and neural indices of taste novelty.

Authors:  Sabiha K Barot; Ilene L Bernstein
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Kristine B Bonacchi; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

Review 10.  Flavor Preferences Conditioned by Dietary Glutamate.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.