Literature DB >> 18602411

Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats.

Kristine B Bonacchi1, Karen Ackroff, Anthony Sclafani.   

Abstract

Rats have an inborn preference for sweet taste and learn to prefer flavors associated with sweetness. They are also strongly attracted to the taste of glucose polymers (e.g., Polycose). This "poly" taste differs in quality from the sweet taste of sugar. To determine if poly taste, like sweet taste, conditions flavor preferences rats were trained with a distinctive flavor (CS+) added to 2% Polycose solution and a different flavor (CS-) added to plain water. In a subsequent two-bottle test the rats did not prefer the CS+ to CS- when both flavors were presented in water. In contrast, other rats significantly preferred a CS+ flavor that had been paired with 2% sucrose. Adding saccharin to a flavored Polycose solution did not improve CS+ flavor learning; rather, Polycose appeared to overshadow saccharin-induced conditioning. Flavor conditioning by a 16% Polycose solution was assessed using a sham-feeding procedure to prevent post-oral reinforcement. Although the rats sham-fed substantial amounts of the CS+ flavored Polycose solution, they failed to prefer the CS+ to the CS- flavor. This contrasts with the preference other rats displayed for a CS+ paired with sham-fed sucrose. Why attractive sweet and poly tastes differ in their ability to condition flavor preferences is not certain, although some findings suggest that they differentially activate dopamine and/or serotonin circuits involved in flavor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18602411      PMCID: PMC2601560          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  61 in total

1.  Central opioid receptor subtype antagonists differentially alter sucrose and deprivation-induced water intake in rats.

Authors:  I W Beczkowska; W D Bowen; R J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-09-04       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Oral and postoral determinants of food reward.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-07

3.  Reinforcer devaluation in palatability-based learned flavor preferences.

Authors:  D M Dwyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-10

4.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Deprivation alters rats' flavor preferences for carbohydrates and fats.

Authors:  A Sclafani; K Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1993-06

6.  Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.

Authors:  J W Nissenbaum; A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Sex differences in polysaccharide and sugar preferences in rats.

Authors:  A Sclafani; H Hertwig; M Vigorito; M B Feigin
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Hedonic response of rats to polysaccharide and sugar solutions.

Authors:  A Sclafani; A E Clyne
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Influence of saccharide length on polysaccharide appetite in the rat.

Authors:  A Sclafani; H Hertwig; M Vigorito; H Sloan; B Kerzner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Central opioid receptor subtype antagonists differentially reduce intake of saccharin and maltose dextrin solutions in rats.

Authors:  I W Beczkowska; J E Koch; M E Bostock; S F Leibowitz; R J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1993-08-06       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  An application of Pavlovian principles to the problems of obesity and cognitive decline.

Authors:  T L Davidson; C H Sample; S E Swithers
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

3.  Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Alexander Pinhas; Michael Aviel; Michael Koen; Simon Gurgov; Vanessa Acosta; Michael Israel; Leonid Kakuriev; Elena Guskova; Isabelle Fuzailov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-14

4.  Experience Informs Consummatory Choices for Congruent and Incongruent Odor-Taste Mixtures in Rats.

Authors:  Kelsey A McQueen; Kelly E Fredericksen; Chad L Samuelsen
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; Tiffany R Aleman; Hillary T Ellis; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Intake of high-intensity sweeteners alters the ability of sweet taste to signal caloric consequences: implications for the learned control of energy and body weight regulation.

Authors:  Terry L Davidson; Ashley A Martin; Kiely Clark; Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Alcohol gains access to appetitive learning through adolescent heavy drinking.

Authors:  Alyssa DiLeo; Kristina M Wright; Elizabeth Mangone; Michael A McDannald
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Obesogenic diets may differentially alter dopamine control of sucrose and fructose intake in rats.

Authors:  Carolyn E Pritchett; Andras Hajnal
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-05-01

9.  Experience-dependent c-Fos expression in the primary chemosensory cortices of the rat.

Authors:  Sanaya Bamji-Stocke; Bradley T Biggs; Chad L Samuelsen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  BMI modulates calorie-dependent dopamine changes in accumbens from glucose intake.

Authors:  Gene-Jack Wang; Dardo Tomasi; Antonio Convit; Jean Logan; Christopher T Wong; Elena Shumay; Joanna S Fowler; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.