Literature DB >> 8230507

Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

W W Schuessler1, M T Grune, L V Tecuanhuey, G M Preminger.   

Abstract

As laparoscopic nephrectomy has become a viable ablative procedure for kidney removal, additional areas of reconstructive laparoscopic urological procedures are being investigated. We describe our early experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Technical highlights include initial placement of an internal ureteral stent, lateral insufflation, placement of 5, 10 mm. trocars, pyelotomy (or reduction pyeloplasty performed with articulating laparoscopic scissors, reapproximation of the ureteropelvic junction with a running 4-zero polyglactin suture, placement of a 7 mm. suction drain in the retroperitoneal space and reapproximation of the colon to the body wall with a hernia stapler. We have performed laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 5 patients with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Operating time ranged from 3 to 7 hours, with the majority of time devoted to laparoscopic suturing (1 to 3 hours). Hospital stay averaged 3 days and all patients returned to normal activity within 1 week. Followup averaged 12 months (range 9 to 17 months) with complete resolution of symptoms in all patients. We believe that this innovative reconstructive laparoscopic procedure can be used for treatment of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction as in patients with a large, redundant renal pelvis or crossing lower pole vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8230507     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35898-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  107 in total

1.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: Excellent long-term results of primary pyeloplasty].

Authors:  M Traumann; L A Kluth; M Schmid; C Meyer; B Schwaiger; C Rosenbaum; P Schriefer; M Fisch; R Dahlem; D Seiler; S Ahyai; A Haese; F K-H Chun
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Pyeloplasty - pro robotic-assisted].

Authors:  Z Akçetin; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Endopyelotomy in the age of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Yong; David M Albala
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Michael V Hollis; Patricia S Cho; Richard N Yu
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Surgical Approaches to Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Ryan W Tubre; John M Gatti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Laparoscopic management of hydronephrosis in children.

Authors:  Alaa El-Ghoneimi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  [Reconstructive procedures in laparoscopic urology].

Authors:  G Janetschek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Use of laparoscopy in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Christina Kim; Steven G Docimo
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 9.  Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Stein; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Robotic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.