Literature DB >> 25391441

[Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: Excellent long-term results of primary pyeloplasty].

M Traumann1, L A Kluth, M Schmid, C Meyer, B Schwaiger, C Rosenbaum, P Schriefer, M Fisch, R Dahlem, D Seiler, S Ahyai, A Haese, F K-H Chun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the development of the robot-assisted surgical technique, robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) has become established as an alternative to open and laparoscopic surgery. Currently there are only a few single-center studies with larger numbers of cases and long-term results. The aim of this study was to investigate perioperative and long-term postoperative success rates of Anderson-Hynes robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) at a single center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our RAP experience of 61 patients performed by two surgeons between 2004 and 2013 regarding operating time, length of hospital stay, perioperative complication, and success. Overall success was measured in terms of necessary redo pyeloplasty. We also identified patients with temporary stent placement due to symptomatic hydronephrosis or with further obstruction in diuretic renography.
RESULTS: Median age, operating time, and follow-up were 33 years, 195 min, and 64 months, respectively. No conversion to open procedure was necessary. The success rate was 98% (n=60) with 1 patient undergoing open redo pyeloplasty due to a recurrent stenosis. Temporary stent placement was required in 3 patients due to pyelonephritis and dilatation.
CONCLUSION: Satisfying long-term success rates including low complication rates of RAP were obtained in this study. RAP presents a safe and standardized procedure for symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25391441     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3654-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  23 in total

1.  Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Richard Neururer; Georg Bartsch; Reinhard Peschel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.

Authors:  Iqbal Singh; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.344

3.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard.

Authors:  D A Moon; M A El-Shazly; C M Chang; T R Gianduzzo; C G Eden
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Different pyeloplasty approaches, similar excellent results.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Alessandro Iannetti; Fabio Vianello; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Shyam Sukumar; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ariella A Friedman; Felix K Chun; Jesse Sammon; Khurshid R Ghani; Praful Ravi; Marco Bianchi; Wooju Jeong; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jens Hansen; James O Peabody; Jack S Elder; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches.

Authors:  M Soulié; M Thoulouzan; P Seguin; P Mouly; N Vazzoler; F Pontonnier; P Plante
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic vs open pyeloplasty with minimal incision: subjective and objective assessment in adults.

Authors:  Manish Garg; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul Janak Sinha; Satya Narayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  W W Schuessler; M T Grune; L V Tecuanhuey; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Chandru P Sundaram; Robert L Grubb; Jamil Rehman; Yan Yan; Cathy Chen; Jaime Landman; Elspeth M McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  [A retrospective comparison of robotic assisted and conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in two centres].

Authors:  H Griessner; L Oberhammer; M Pallauf; D Oswald; T Kunit; D Colleselli; A Merseburger; M Kramer; L Lusuardi; M Mitterberger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.