Literature DB >> 27430017

Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.

Michael V Hollis1, Patricia S Cho1, Richard N Yu1.   

Abstract

The laparoscopic approach to the pyeloplasty procedure has proven to be safe and effective in the pediatric population. Multiple studies have revealed outcomes comparable to the open approach. However, a major drawback to laparoscopy is the technical challenge of precise suturing in the small working space in children. The advantages of robotic surgery when compared to conventional laparoscopy have been well established and include motion scaling, enhanced magnification, 3-dimensional stereoscopic vision, and improved instrument dexterity. As a result, surgeons with limited laparoscopic experience are able to more readily acquire robotic surgical skills. Limitations of the robotic platform include its high costs for acquisition and maintenance, as well as the need for additional robotic surgical training. In this article, we review the current status of the robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, including a brief history, comparative outcomes, cost considerations, and training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatric; Pyeloplasty; Robotic; Urological Surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 27430017      PMCID: PMC4943328          DOI: 10.1166/ajrs.2015.1024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Robot Surg


  59 in total

1.  A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?

Authors:  Courtney K Rowe; Michael W Pierce; Katherine C Tecci; Constance S Houck; James Mandell; Alan B Retik; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Cost analysis of pediatric robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Daniel P Casella; Janelle A Fox; Francis X Schneck; Glenn M Cannon; Michael C Ost
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Editorial comment on: Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Complications in pediatric urological laparoscopy: results of a survey.

Authors:  C A Peters
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A minimal invasive surgical approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Ulrike Subotic; Imke Rohard; Daniel Max Weber; Rita Gobet; Ueli Moehrlen; Ricardo Gonzalez
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.830

6.  Endopyelotomy for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children.

Authors:  H L Tan; A Najmaldin; D R Webb
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: an 8-year followup.

Authors:  J A Motola; G H Badlani; A D Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort.

Authors:  D Bansal; N G Cost; W R DeFoor; P P Reddy; E A Minevich; B A Vanderbrink; S Alam; C A Sheldon; P H Noh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  Retrograde balloon dilation of ureteropelvic obstructions in infants and children: early results.

Authors:  H L Tan; J P Roberts; D Grattan-Smith
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Infant robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Danesh Bansal; Nicholas G Cost; Christopher M Bean; Brian A Vanderbrink; Marion Schulte; Paul H Noh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.830

View more
  5 in total

1.  Instituting robotic pediatric urologic surgery in the Canadian healthcare system: Evaluating the feasibility and outcomes of robot-assisted pyeloplasty and ureteric reimplantation.

Authors:  Noah Stern; Peter Wang; Sumit Dave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Comparative, Prospective, Case-Control Study of Open versus Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Long-term Results.

Authors:  Lisandro A Piaggio; Juan P Corbetta; Santiago Weller; Ricardo Augusto Dingevan; Víctor Duran; Javier Ruiz; Juan C Lopez
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty with the use of the Contour™ stent: description of the technique and analysis of outcomes after the first 30 cases.

Authors:  Franco Gaboardi; Guglielmo Mantica; Salvatore Smelzo; Giovannalberto Pini; Davide De Marchi; Giovanni Passaretti; Giuseppe Saitta; Lorenzo Rigatti; Nazareno Suardi
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-01-04

4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in the paediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samih Taktak; Oliver Llewellyn; Mohamed Aboelsoud; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-03-22

Review 5.  Expanding the Utilization of Robotic Procedures in Urologic Surgery.

Authors:  Tareq Aro; Michael Mullerad; Gilad E Amiel
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-10-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.