Literature DB >> 8227403

Mandatory use of confirmation stage with Chlamydiazyme during urinary sediment analysis.

J R Anderson1, G Mumtaz, P Mulhare, J Poddar, G L Ridgway.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess whether false positive results found when the first stage Chlamydiazyme test is performed on urinary sediment could be reduced by using the more specific second stage blocking assay.
METHODS: Sediment from 173 urine samples from patients with suspected urinary tract infection caused by Gram negative bacteria and 23 control urine samples were tested using the Chlamydiazyme assay system, which included a blocking assay.
RESULTS: A reaction result with the first stage Chlamydiazyme assay test was seen in 102 (58.9%) of the test urine samples. First stage reactivity was not blocked by the Chlamydiazyme confirmatory assay performed on repeat testing. All were correctly identified as true negative (first test false positive) results.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a second (specific) blocking assay for the analysis of urinary sediment using Chlamydiazyme eliminates false positive results in Gram negative urinary tract infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8227403      PMCID: PMC501613          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.46.10.896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  6 in total

1.  False positive results with an ELISA for detection of chlamydia antigen.

Authors:  T Riordan; D A Ellis; P I Matthews; S F Ratcliffe
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the chlamydiazyme test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

Authors:  J Moncada; J Schachter; G Bolan; J Engelman; L Howard; I Mushahwar; G Ridgway; G Mumtaz; W Stamm; A Clark
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  False-positive Chlamydiazyme results during urine sediment analysis due to bacterial urinary tract infections.

Authors:  J Demaio; R S Boyd; R Rensi; A Clark
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) with confirmatory test for the detection of chlamydial antigen in urine from men.

Authors:  G Mumtaz; G L Ridgway; S Clark; E Allason-Jones
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.359

5.  Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas; M F Osborn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  False positive results with the use of chlamydial antigen detection tests in the evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in children.

Authors:  M R Hammerschlag; P J Rettig; M E Shields
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.129

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.