Literature DB >> 8224576

Acoustical properties of speech produced in noise presented through supra-aural earphones.

T Letowski1, T Frank, J Caravella.   

Abstract

This study determined the acoustical properties of speech known as Lombard Speech produced in background noise. Tape recordings were made for ten normally hearing adults (5 women, 5 men) reading connected speech (131 word passage "My Grandfather") at their most comfortable level in quiet and in wideband, traffic, and multitalker noise delivered through earphones at 70 and 90 dB SPL. Spectral analysis of the recordings revealed that, compared with speech in quiet, Lombard speech was characterized by: (1) an increase in overall SPL; (2) smaller vocal pitch shifts for female than male subjects; (3) shifts in spectral distributions of speech energy; and (4) the same spectral slope above 630 Hz regardless of subject gender, noise level, or noise type. Overall, the results of this study do not provide support for the theory that acoustical properties of Lombard speech are identical with loud speech produced in quiet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8224576     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199310000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  11 in total

1.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Children's perception of speech produced in a two-talker background.

Authors:  Mallory Baker; Emily Buss; Adam Jacks; Crystal Taylor; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Toward a Consensus Description of Vocal Effort, Vocal Load, Vocal Loading, and Vocal Fatigue.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Eva van Leer; Miriam van Mersbergen; Chaya Devie Nanjundeswaran; Pasquale Bottalico; Mary J Sandage; Susanna Whitling
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Effects of added absorption on the vocal exertions of talkers in a reverberant room.

Authors:  Michael K Rollins; Timothy W Leishman; Jennifer K Whiting; Eric J Hunter; Dennis L Eggett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The impact of perilaryngeal vibration on the self-perception of loudness and the Lombard effect.

Authors:  François-Xavier Brajot; Don Nguyen; Jeffrey DiGiovanni; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Prosodic adaptations to pitch perturbation in running speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Caroline Niziolek; Kevin Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Teachers and Teaching: Speech Production Accommodations Due to Changes in the Acoustic Environment.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Pasquale Bottalico; Simone Graetzer; Timothy W Leishman; Mark L Berardi; Nathan G Eyring; Zachary R Jensen; Michael K Rolins; Jennifer K Whiting
Journal:  Energy Procedia       Date:  2015-11

Review 8.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Older Listeners' Perception of Speech With Strengthened and Weakened Dynamic Pitch Cues in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Sensory attenuation of self-produced feedback: the Lombard effect revisited.

Authors:  Amanda S Therrien; James Lyons; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.