Literature DB >> 1100136

Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data.

H K Ury.   

Abstract

The statistical efficiency of a study design which matches each case with k controls is compared with that of the standard matched-pairs setup. For the situation in which the distribution of measurements on the factor under investigation is continuous, the comparison criterion used is the reciprocal of the variance ratio of the corresponding case-control difference estimators; for dichotomous observations, the Pitman efficiency of Miettinen's test [1969] or of Pike and Morrow's test [1970] relative to McNemar's test is used. When the variances for continuously distributed case and control measurements are equal to the same result, 2k/(k + 1), is obtained for both situations and, more generally, the efficiency of k1 controls relative to k2 controls is given by k1(k2 + 1)/k2(k1 + 1). The Pitman efficiency is compared with the "practical efficiency" for large-sample dichotomous situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1100136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  66 in total

1.  An assessment of the ability of routine restaurant inspections to predict food-borne outbreaks in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Authors:  M A Cruz; D J Katz; J A Suarez
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Sample size evaluation for a multiply matched case-control study using the score test from a conditional logistic (discrete Cox PH) regression model.

Authors:  John M Lachin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease.

Authors:  D J Schaid; C Rowland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator for two-stage designs.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Hospital mergers and market overlap.

Authors:  G R Brooks; V G Jones
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Assessing the quality of life among caregivers of patients with gliomas.

Authors:  Patricia Minaya Flores; Julie Berbis; Olivier Chinot; Pascal Auquier
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2014-10-16

7.  Indirect Standardization Matching: Assessing Specific Advantage and Risk Synergy.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Richard N Ross; Justin M Ludwig; Wei Wang; Bijan A Niknam; Alexander S Hill; Orit Even-Shoshan; Rachel R Kelz; Lee A Fleisher
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Non-parametric Evaluation of Biomarker Accuracy under Nested Case-control Studies.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Statistical methods for studying disease subtype heterogeneity.

Authors:  Molin Wang; Donna Spiegelman; Aya Kuchiba; Paul Lochhead; Sehee Kim; Andrew T Chan; Elizabeth M Poole; Rulla Tamimi; Shelley S Tworoger; Edward Giovannucci; Bernard Rosner; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Prolongation of hospital stay and extra costs due to ventilator-associated pneumonia in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  I Kappstein; G Schulgen; U Beyer; K Geiger; M Schumacher; F D Daschner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.