Literature DB >> 19663899

A Bayesian model for estimating the effects of drug use when drug use may be under-reported.

Garnett P McMillan1, Edward Bedrick, Janet C'deBaca.   

Abstract

AIMS: We present a statistical model for evaluating the effects of substance use when substance use might be under-reported. The model is a special case of the Bayesian formulation of the 'classical' measurement error model, requiring that the analyst quantify prior beliefs about rates of under-reporting and the true prevalence of substance use in the study population.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: A diversion program for youths on probation for drug-related crimes. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 257 youths at risk for re-incarceration. MEASUREMENTS: The effects of true cocaine use on recidivism risks while accounting for possible under-reporting.
FINDINGS: The proposed model showed a 60% lower mean time to re-incarceration among actual cocaine users. This effect size is about 75% larger than that estimated in the analysis that relies only on self-reported cocaine use. Sensitivity analysis comparing different prior beliefs about prevalence of cocaine use and rates of under-reporting universally indicate larger effects than the analysis that assumes that everyone tells the truth about their drug use.
CONCLUSION: The proposed Bayesian model allows one to estimate the effect of actual drug use on study outcome measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19663899      PMCID: PMC2763048          DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02644.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  10 in total

1.  Reliability of Form 90D: An Instrument for Quantifying Drug Use.

Authors:  Verner S. Westerberg; J. Scott Tonigan; William R. Miller
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.716

Review 2.  The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research.

Authors:  Frances K Del Boca; Jack Darkes
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Validity of adolescent self-report of substance use.

Authors:  Robert J Williams; Nadine Nowatzki
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  Is it necessary to correct for measurement error in nutritional epidemiology?

Authors:  Anne C M Thiébaut; Laurence S Freedman; Raymond J Carroll; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Brief motivational interviewing for teens at risk of substance use consequences: a randomized pilot study in a primary care clinic.

Authors:  Elizabeth J D'Amico; Jeremy N V Miles; Stefanie A Stern; Lisa S Meredith
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2007-11-26

Review 6.  Validity of self-reported alcohol use: a literature review and assessment.

Authors:  L T Midanik
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1988-09

7.  The validity of methadone clients' self-reported drug use.

Authors:  S Magura; D Goldsmith; C Casriel; P J Goldstein; D S Lipton
Journal:  Int J Addict       Date:  1987-08

8.  Conditional independence models for epidemiological studies with covariate measurement error.

Authors:  S Richardson; W R Gilks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  A Bayesian approach to measurement error problems in epidemiology using conditional independence models.

Authors:  S Richardson; W R Gilks
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Methodological issues in measuring alcohol use.

Authors:  Deborah A Dawson
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2003
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Bayesian Approach to Modeling Risk of Hospital Admissions Associated With Schizophrenia Accounting for Underdiagnosis of the Disorder in Administrative Records.

Authors:  Eileen M Stock; James D Stamey; John E Zeber; Alexander W Thompson; Laurel A Copeland
Journal:  Comput Psychiatr       Date:  2018-02-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.