Literature DB >> 8207146

Acoustic information available to bats using frequency-modulated sounds for the perception of insect prey.

C F Moss1, M Zagaeski.   

Abstract

Through the present study, the acoustic information available to an echolocating bat that uses brief frequency-modulated (FM) sonar sounds for the pursuit and capture of insect prey has been characterized. Computer-generated sonar pulses were broadcast at tethered insects, and the returning echoes were recorded on analog tape at high speed for off-line analyses. Echoes from stationary and fluttering insects were displayed using time waveform, spectrogram, power spectrum, and cross-correlation representations. The results show echo signatures for the different insect species studied, which change with the angle of incident sound. Sequences of echoes from fluttering insects show irregular changes in sound amplitude and time-frequency structure, reflecting a random temporal relation between the changing wing position and the arrival of incident sound. A set of recordings that controlled the temporal relation between incident sound and insect wing position suggests that information about the spatial profile of a flying insect could be enhanced if the bat were to produce a sequence of sounds that synchronized briefly with the moving target's wing-beat cycle. From this study, it has been proposed that the FM bat receives stroboscopic-like glimpses of fluttering prey whose spatial representation depends on the operation of the bat's sonar receiver.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8207146     DOI: 10.1121/1.409843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Perception of echo delay is disrupted by small temporal misalignment of echo harmonics in bat sonar.

Authors:  Mary E Bates; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Thoracic scales of moths as a stealth coating against bat biosonar.

Authors:  Thomas R Neil; Zhiyuan Shen; Daniel Robert; Bruce W Drinkwater; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Effects of filtering of harmonics from biosonar echoes on delay acuity by big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Authors:  Mary E Bates; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A comprehensive computational model of animal biosonar signal processing.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Stephanie Haro; Andrea Megela Simmons; James A Simmons
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Evidence for spatial representation of object shape by echolocating bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Authors:  Caroline M Delong; Rebecca Bragg; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Echo-delay resolution in sonar images of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; C F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Target shape perception and clutter rejection use the same mechanism in bat sonar.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Moth wing scales slightly increase the absorbance of bat echolocation calls.

Authors:  Jinyao Zeng; Ning Xiang; Lei Jiang; Gareth Jones; Yongmei Zheng; Bingwan Liu; Shuyi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High duty cycle to low duty cycle: echolocation behaviour of the hipposiderid bat Coelops frithii.

Authors:  Ying-Yi Ho; Yin-Ping Fang; Cheng-Han Chou; Hsi-Chi Cheng; Hsueh-Wen Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.