Literature DB >> 8205614

Imprinting and X chromosome counting mechanisms determine Xist expression in early mouse development.

G F Kay1, S C Barton, M A Surani, S Rastan.   

Abstract

In mice, X inactivation is preceded by in cis Xist expression. Initially, normal female embryos express the paternal Xist allele exclusively, preceding imprinted X inactivation in the trophectoderm. Later expression of Xist alleles is random, preceding random X inactivation in the epiblast lineage. In this study using uniparental embryos, we demonstrate that Xist expression is initially dictated solely by parental imprinting, causing expression of all paternal alleles. Maternal alleles remain repressed, irrespective of X chromosome number. At the compacting morula stage, this parental imprint is erased, and the mechanism counting the X chromosomes imposes appropriate Xist expression with respect to chromosome number. Our results also suggest that Xist expression may itself be regulated by a novel imprinted maternally expressed gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8205614     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90049-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  67 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease.

Authors:  J G Falls; D J Pulford; A A Wylie; R L Jirtle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Nucleolar dominance: uniparental gene silencing on a multi-megabase scale in genetic hybrids.

Authors:  C S Pikaard
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  IL1RAPL1 gene deletion as a cause of X-linked intellectual disability and dysmorphic features.

Authors:  Erin L Youngs; Rebecca Henkhaus; Jessica A Hellings; Merlin G Butler
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Coadaptation in mother and infant regulated by a paternally expressed imprinted gene.

Authors:  James P Curley; Sheila Barton; Azim Surani; Eric B Keverne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Genomic imprinting and epigenetic control of development.

Authors:  Andrew Fedoriw; Joshua Mugford; Terry Magnuson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  The X as model for RNA's niche in epigenomic regulation.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  Two-step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse.

Authors:  Satoshi H Namekawa; Bernhard Payer; Khanh D Huynh; Rudolf Jaenisch; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Solving the "X" in embryos and stem cells.

Authors:  Pablo Bermejo-Alvarez; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Alfonso Gutierrez-Adan
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.272

10.  Dynamic methylation adjustment and counting as part of imprinting mechanisms.

Authors:  R Shemer; Y Birger; W L Dean; W Reik; A D Riggs; A Razin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.