Literature DB >> 8205077

External- and middle-ear factors affecting evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates.

A R Thornton1, L Kimm, C R Kennedy, D Cafarelli-Dees.   

Abstract

Babies without any of the known risk factors for hearing impairment were taken from normal maternity wards and tested daily for 3 days post-partum. Tympanometric and evoked otoacoustic emission data were obtained from 121 babies. Middle-ear pressure and middle-ear compliance values were obtained with a Grason Stadler Middle-Ear Analyser (GSI-33) using a 1000-Hz probe tone. All babies had their evoked emissions measured on the Programmable Otoacoustic Emissions Measurement System (POEMS) equipment. The middle-ear compliance, the proportion of normally shaped tympanograms, the middle-ear pressure and the proportion passing EOAE testing all improved over the 3 days. However, the statistically significant factors affecting the pass rate appeared to be only the middle-ear pressure (for a small number of babies) and the degree of obstruction of the external ear canal. Whilst both these factors play a part in determining emission pass/fail rates they do not fully account for the observed changes in pass rate. There are developmental and other mechanisms which must contribute to the increase in pass rate as the baby matures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8205077     DOI: 10.3109/03005369309076710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  8 in total

1.  Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Community based universal neonatal hearing screening by health visitors using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M Owen; M Webb; K Evans
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Comparative evaluation of Transient Evoked Oto-acoustic Emissions and Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry as screening modality for hearing impairment in neonates.

Authors:  Rajiv Dhawan; N N Mathur
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-04-26

4.  Confirmation of deafness in infancy.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry.

Authors:  Chris A Sanford; Douglas H Keefe; Yi-Wen Liu; Denis Fitzpatrick; Ryan W McCreery; Dawna E Lewis; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Transient Otoacoustic Emissions and Auditory Brainstem Responses in Low-Risk Cohort of Newborn and One-Month-Old Infants: Assessment of Infant Auditory System Physiology in the Prenatal Alcohol in SIDS and Stillbirth Network Safe Passage Study.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Carmen G Condon; Howard J Hoffman; Amy J Elliott; Hein J Odendaal; Larry L Burd; Michael M Myers; William P Fifer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Evidence for a Right-Ear Advantage in Newborn Hearing Screening Results.

Authors:  Daphne Ari-Even Roth; Minka Hildesheimer; Ilan Roziner; Yael Henkin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  High Frequency Tympanometry (1,000 Hz) for Neonates with Normal and Abnormal Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Maryam Emadi; Mohammad Rezaei; Morteza Hamidi Nahrani; Masoud Bolandi
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2016-11-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.