Literature DB >> 19701089

Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry.

Chris A Sanford1, Douglas H Keefe, Yi-Wen Liu, Denis Fitzpatrick, Ryan W McCreery, Dawna E Lewis, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) test outcomes can be influenced by conditions affecting the sound conduction pathway, including ear canal and/or middle ear function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test performance of wideband (WB) acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry in terms of their ability to predict the status of the sound conduction pathway for ears that passed or were referred in a UNHS program.
DESIGN: A distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) test was used to determine the UNHS status of 455 infant ears (375 passed and 80 referred). WB and 1-kHz tests were performed immediately after the infant's first DPOAE test (day 1). Of the 80 infants referred on day 1, 67 infants were evaluated again after a second UNHS DPOAE test the next day (day 2). WB data were acquired under ambient and tympanometric (pressurized) ear canal conditions. Clinical decision theory analysis was used to assess the test performance of WB and 1-kHz tests in terms of their ability to classify ears that passed or were referred, using DPOAE UNHS test outcomes as the "gold standard." Specifically, performance was assessed using previously published measurement criteria and a maximum-likelihood procedure for 1-kHz tympanometry and WB measurements, respectively.
RESULTS: For measurements from day 1, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 for an ambient WB test predictor. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve among several variables derived from 1-kHz tympanometry was 0.75. In general, ears that passed the DPOAE UNHS test had higher energy absorbance compared with those that were referred, indicating that infants who passed the DPOAE UNHS had a more acoustically efficient conductive pathway.
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that (1) WB tests had better performance in classifying UNHS DPOAE outcomes than 1-kHz tympanometry; (2) WB tests provide data to suggest that many UNHS referrals are a consequence of transient conditions affecting the sound conduction pathway; (3) WB data reveal changes in sound conduction during the first 2 days of life; and (4) because WB measurements used in the present study are objective and quick it may be feasible to consider implementing such measurements in conjunction with UNHS programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19701089      PMCID: PMC3519360          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b61cdc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  60 in total

1.  Wideband reflectance tympanometry in normal adults.

Authors:  R H Margolis; G L Saly; D H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age effects in the human middle ear: wideband acoustical measures.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Chris A Sanford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A nonlinear finite-element model of the newborn ear canal.

Authors:  Li Qi; Hengjin Liu; Justyn Lutfy; W Robert J Funnell; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Choice of probe tone and classification of trace patterns in tympanometry undertaken in early infancy.

Authors:  Margaret Baldwin
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Wideband reflectance norms for Caucasian and Chinese young adults.

Authors:  Navid Shahnaz; Karin Bork
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: introduction and overview of the study.

Authors:  Jean L Johnson; Karl R White; Judith E Widen; Judith S Gravel; Betty R Vohr; Michele James; Teresa Kennalley; Antonia B Maxon; Lynn Spivak; Maureen Sullivan-Mahoney; Yusnita Weirather; Sally Meyer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brain stem response, and otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  K J Doyle; B Burggraaff; S Fujikawa; J Kim; C J MacArthur
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Normative multifrequency tympanometry in infants and toddlers.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Tracy S Fitzgerald; Beth A Prieve
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery.

Authors:  T Finitzo; K Albright; J O'Neal
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Theory of forward and reverse middle-ear transmission applied to otoacoustic emissions in infant and adult ears.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Detecting high-frequency hearing loss with click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Shawn S Goodman; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Clinical benefit of wideband-tympanometry: a pediatric audiology clinical study.

Authors:  Laura Stuppert; Sabine Nospes; Andrea Bohnert; Anne Katrin Läßig; Annette Limberger; Tobias Rader
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Wideband acoustic transfer functions predict middle-ear effusion.

Authors:  John C Ellison; Michael Gorga; Edward Cohn; Denis Fitzpatrick; Chris A Sanford; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Pressurized Wideband Acoustic Stapedial Reflex Thresholds: Normal Development and Relationships to Auditory Function in Infants.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-07

7.  Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; M Patrick Feeney; Judi A Lapsley Miller; Patricia S Jeng; Susie Bohning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Do "optimal" conditions improve distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance?

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Wideband acoustic-reflex test in a test battery to predict middle-ear dysfunction.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Denis Fitzpatrick; Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Wideband aural acoustic absorbance predicts conductive hearing loss in children.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.