Literature DB >> 8193351

Amifostine (WR-2721) shortens the engraftment period of 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide-purged bone marrow in breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow support.

E J Shpall1, S M Stemmer, L Hami, W A Franklin, L Shaw, H S Bonner, S I Bearman, W P Peters, R C Bast, W McCulloch.   

Abstract

4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4-HC), a commonly used marrow-purging agent, is active against many tumors, but is also toxic to normal marrow progenitors. Amifostine (WR-2721) is a sulfhydryl compound with chemoprotectant activity. Preclinical studies using suspensions of bone marrow and breast cancer cells demonstrated that ex vivo treatment with amifostine followed by 4-HC resulted in protection of marrow progenitors, with no compromise in the antitumor effect of 4-HC. This fact stimulated the development of a clinical trial. Bone marrow was harvested from 15 poor-prognosis breast cancer patients and randomly assigned to ex vivo treatment with amifostine followed by 4-HC (amifostine + 4-HC), or treatment with 4-HC alone. High-dose chemotherapy was then administered followed by infusion of the purged autologous bone marrow support (ABMS). Leukocyte engraftment, defined as a white blood cell count > or = 1 x 10(9)/L, was achieved in an average of 26 days for patients whose marrow was purged with amifostine + 4-HC versus 36 days for patients whose marrow was purged with 4-HC alone (P = .032). The average number of platelet transfusions (12 v 29; P = .017) and days of antibiotic therapy (28 v 40; P = .012) were significantly less for patients whose marrow was exposed to amifostine + 4-HC, compared with 4-HC alone. Unpurged backup marrow fractions were infused into three patients whose marrow was purged with 4-HC alone, because of inadequate marrow recovery. None of the patients who received amifostine + 4-HC-purged marrow required a backup marrow fraction. Complete remissions were achieved in 83% of patients with measurable disease, with no difference between the two cohorts. Forty-three percent of patients remained alive and progression-free at a mean of 13 months posttransplant. There was no significant difference in the rate or pattern of relapse for patients whose marrow was purged with amifostine + 4-HC compared with those whose marrow was purged with 4-HC alone. Ex vivo treatment of marrow with amifostine significantly shortens the time to marrow recovery, thereby reducing the risk of myelosuppressive complications in breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and 4-HC-purged ABMS. Since supportive care requirements are also significantly decreased, amifostine may reduce the cost of such therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8193351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  11 in total

1.  In vitro protection from cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity by amifostine and its metabolite WR1065.

Authors:  C C Verstappen; A A Geldof; T J Postma; J J Heimans
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Clinical and preclinical modulation of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in patients with cancer.

Authors:  K Hoekman; W J van der Vijgh; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Chemoprotectants: a review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  M Links; C Lewis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  A risk-benefit assessment of amifostine in cytoprotection.

Authors:  M Mabro; S Faivre; E Raymond
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Amifostine: an update on its clinical status as a cytoprotectant in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy and its potential therapeutic application in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  C R Culy; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Potentiation of the antitumor effect of Merocyanine 540-mediated photodynamic therapy by amifostine and amphotericin B.

Authors:  Ichiro Tsujino; Kiyoko Miyagi; Reynée W Sampson; Fritz Sieber
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 7.  Amifostine: potential for clinically useful cytoprotection.

Authors:  G T Budd; V Lorenzi; R Ganapathi; D Adelstein; R Pelley; T Olencki; D McLain; R M Bukowski
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Amifostine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential as a radioprotector and cytotoxic chemoprotector.

Authors:  C M Spencer; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  The sulfhydryl containing compounds WR-2721 and glutathione as radio- and chemoprotective agents. A review, indications for use and prospects.

Authors:  G A Hospers; E A Eisenhauer; E G de Vries
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  In vitro effect of amifostine on haematopoietic progenitors exposed to carboplatin and non-alkylating antineoplastic drugs: haematoprotection acts as a drug-specific progenitor rescue.

Authors:  L Pierelli; G Scambia; A Fattorossi; G Bonanno; A Battaglia; A Perillo; G Menichella; P B Panici; G Leone; S Mancuso
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.