Literature DB >> 7858931

Amifostine: potential for clinically useful cytoprotection.

G T Budd1, V Lorenzi, R Ganapathi, D Adelstein, R Pelley, T Olencki, D McLain, R M Bukowski.   

Abstract

The ability to target malignant cells for cytotoxicity while sparing normal host tissues has proven to be limited. These limitations have resulted in unacceptable toxicity or insufficiently effective therapy. Continuing investigation of new, potentially useful cytotoxic agents must continue. An alternative approach, also worthy of study, is the selective protection of normal tissues. This approach, used in conjunction with available therapeutic agents, may open the therapeutic window and incrementally enhance the effectiveness of cytotoxic therapy. A variety of methods have been used to protect normal tissues selectively. Regional protection can be used for certain organ systems, such as the oral mucosa. Selective protection on a systemic level is more difficult but agents that seem to protect normal but not malignant tissues selectively are being developed. Among these is amifostine, which was originally selected by the U.S. defense department for study as a radioprotectant. Pre-clinical studies have suggested that amifostine is differentially concentrated in normal tissues but not in malignant tissues. Tissue-specific differences in the activity of alkaline phosphatase, which dephosphorylates amifostine to its active metabolite WR-1065, and in pH are thought to be involved in this relative specificity. Clinical studies indicate that amifostine can reduce the myelosuppression produced by cyclosphosphamide, the combination of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin, and, perhaps, carboplatin. The protective effects of amifostine on nonhematopoietic toxicities are being investigated. Future trials will investigate the integration of amifostine with cytokine-based supportive care in order to define the role of this potentially clinically useful cytoprotectant agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7858931     DOI: 10.1007/bf00344052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  26 in total

1.  Alkaline phosphatase promotes radioprotection and accumulation of WR-1065 in V79-171 cells incubated in medium containing WR-2721.

Authors:  P M Calabro-Jones; R C Fahey; G D Smoluk; J F Ward
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1985-01

2.  Final report on phase I trial of WR-2721 before protracted fractionated radiation therapy.

Authors:  M M Kligerman; A T Turrisi; R C Urtasun; A L Norfleet; T L Phillips; T Barkley; P Rubin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Differential protection against cytotoxic chemotherapeutic effects on bone marrow CFUs by Wr-2721.

Authors:  T H Wasserman; T L Phillips; G Ross; L J Kane
Journal:  Cancer Clin Trials       Date:  1981

4.  WR-2721 and high-dose cisplatin: an active combination in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  D Glover; J H Glick; C Weiler; K Fox; D Guerry
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Postirradiation treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and preirradiation WR-2721 administration synergize to enhance hemopoietic reconstitution and increase survival.

Authors:  M L Patchen; T J MacVittie; L M Souza
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Intraperitoneal cis-diamminedichloroplatinum with systemic thiosulfate protection.

Authors:  S B Howell; C E Pfeifle; W E Wung; R A Olshen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  High-dose cisplatin plus WR-2721 in a split course in metastatic malignant melanoma. A phase II study.

Authors:  A C Buzaid; J Murren; H J Durivage
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Uptake of WR-2721 derivatives by cells in culture: identification of the transported form of the drug.

Authors:  P M Calabro-Jones; J A Aguilera; J F Ward; G D Smoluk; R C Fahey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Inhibition of fluorouracil-induced stomatitis by oral cryotherapy.

Authors:  D J Mahood; A M Dose; C L Loprinzi; M H Veeder; L M Athmann; T M Therneau; J M Sorensen; D K Gainey; J A Mailliard; N L Gusa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Treatment of tumours with the combination of WR-2721 and cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (II) or cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  J M Yuhas; J M Spellman; S W Jordan; M C Pardini; S M Afzal; F Culo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer therapies in development. A review of their pharmacology and clinical potential.

Authors:  D de Valeriola; A Awada; J A Roy; A Di Leo; L Biganzoli; M Piccart
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Amifostine protects against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children with average-risk medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Maryam Fouladi; Murali Chintagumpala; David Ashley; Stewart Kellie; Sridharan Gururangan; Tim Hassall; Lindsey Gronewold; Clinton F Stewart; Dana Wallace; Alberto Broniscer; Gregory A Hale; Kimberly A Kasow; Thomas E Merchant; Brannon Morris; Matthew Krasin; Larry E Kun; James M Boyett; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.