Literature DB >> 9792145

In vitro effect of amifostine on haematopoietic progenitors exposed to carboplatin and non-alkylating antineoplastic drugs: haematoprotection acts as a drug-specific progenitor rescue.

L Pierelli1, G Scambia, A Fattorossi, G Bonanno, A Battaglia, A Perillo, G Menichella, P B Panici, G Leone, S Mancuso.   

Abstract

We evaluated the protective ability of amifostine on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived colony-forming unit (CFU) and PB CD34+ cells which were previously exposed in vitro to etoposide, carboplatin, doxorubicin and taxotere. Amifostine pretreatment protected PBMC-derived CFU from the toxic effect of etoposide, carboplatin and taxotere. A significant detrimental effect was exerted by amifostine on the growth of doxorubicin-treated PBMC-derived CFU. Liquid cultures of PB CD34+ cells reproduced faithfully the effects observed on growth of PBMC-derived CFU and confirmed amifostine chemoprotection against etoposide and carboplatin with its detrimental effect on doxorubicin-treated progenitors. Combining the data of viable cell count, cytometric estimation of apoptosis, cell cycle and viable cell replication rate, we found that amifostine protects from etoposide and carboplatin toxicity mainly through a mechanism of cell rescue. Conversely, the detrimental effect of amifostine on the growth of doxorubicin-treated PB CD34+ cells is apparently due to an increased G2/M arrest. In conclusion, amifostine protects haematopoietic progenitors from etoposide, carboplatin and taxotere. Progenitor rescue is the mechanism through which amifostine reduced etoposide and carboplatin toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9792145      PMCID: PMC2063161          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  25 in total

1.  Dose dependence of the cytokinetic and cytotoxic effects of epirubicin in vitro.

Authors:  D Bartkowiak; J Hemmer; E Röttinger
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Evaluation of a novel automated protocol for the collection of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized with chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus G-CSF using the Fresenius AS104 cell separator.

Authors:  L Pierelli; G Menichella; A Paoloni; M Vittori; M L Foddai; R Serafini; C Rumi; H Mitschulat; P L Rossi; G Scambia
Journal:  J Hematother       Date:  1993

3.  Differential chemoprotection of normal and malignant tissues.

Authors:  J M Yuhas; J B Storer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry.

Authors:  A B Lyons; C R Parish
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1994-05-02       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Expression and activity of P-glycoprotein, a multidrug efflux pump, in human hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  P M Chaudhary; I B Roninson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-07-12       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Degradation of 2-(3-aminopropylamino)-ethanethiol (WR-1065) by Cu-dependent amine oxidases and influence on glutathione status of Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  T Meier; R D Issels
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1995-08-08       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Amifostine (WR-2721) shortens the engraftment period of 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide-purged bone marrow in breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow support.

Authors:  E J Shpall; S M Stemmer; L Hami; W A Franklin; L Shaw; H S Bonner; S I Bearman; W P Peters; R C Bast; W McCulloch
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of taxotere (RP 56976) administered as a 24-hour infusion.

Authors:  D Bissett; A Setanoians; J Cassidy; M A Graham; G A Chadwick; P Wilson; V Auzannet; N Le Bail; S B Kaye; D J Kerr
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  WR2721 as a modulator of cisplatin- and carboplatin-induced side effects in comparison with other chemoprotective agents: a molecular approach.

Authors:  M Treskes; W J van der Vijgh
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with cisplatin or epirubicin plus rhG-CSF allows adequate collection of PBSC for autotransplantation during adjuvant therapy for high-risk cancer.

Authors:  G Menichella; L Pierelli; G Scambia; G Salerno; P Benedetti Panici; M L Foddai; R Serafini; G Puglia; M Lai; M Ciarli
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.483

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Amifostine: an update on its clinical status as a cytoprotectant in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy and its potential therapeutic application in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  C R Culy; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Squalene selectively protects mouse bone marrow progenitors against cisplatin and carboplatin-induced cytotoxicity in vivo without protecting tumor growth.

Authors:  Bikul Das; Roula Antoon; Rika Tsuchida; Shamim Lotfi; Olena Morozova; Walid Farhat; David Malkin; Gideon Koren; Herman Yeger; Sylvain Baruchel
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Amifostine (WR2721) confers DNA protection to in vivo cisplatin-treated murine peripheral blood leukocytes.

Authors:  E A Prieto González; A G Fuchs; González S Sánchez
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Amifostine reduces the seminiferous epithelium damage in doxorubicin-treated prepubertal rats without improving the fertility status.

Authors:  Vanessa Vendramini; Estela Sasso-Cerri; Sandra M Miraglia
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 5.211

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.