Literature DB >> 10193684

Chemoprotectants: a review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy.

M Links1, C Lewis.   

Abstract

Dose-limiting toxicity secondary to antineoplastic chemotherapy is due to the inability of cytotoxic drugs to differentiate between normal and malignant cells. The consequences of this may include impairment of patient quality of life, because of toxicity, and reduced tumour control because of the inability to deliver adequate dose-intensive therapy against the cancer. Specific examples of toxicity against normal tissues include cisplatin-related neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, myelotoxicity secondary to treatment with alkylating agents and carboplatin, oxazaphosphorine-induced haemorrhagic cystitis, and cumulative dose-related cardiac toxicity secondary to anthracycline treatment. Chemoprotectants have been developed as a means of ameliorating the toxicity associated with cytotoxic agents by providing site-specific protection for normal tissues, without compromising antitumour efficacy. Clinical trials with toxicity protectors must include sufficient dose-limiting events for study, and assessment of both toxicity (allowing for measurement of efficacy of protection) and antitumour effect. Several chemoprotective compounds have now been extensively investigated, including dexrazoxane, amifostine, glutathione, mesna and ORG 2766. Dexrazoxane appears to complex with metal co-factors including iron, to reduce the incidence of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, allowing the delivery of higher cumulative doses of anthracyclines without the expected consequence of cardiomyopathy. Numerous studies have demonstrated that sulfur-containing nucleophiles, including amifostine, glutathione, and mesna can specifically bind cisplatin- or alkylating agent-generated free radicals or alkylating agent metabolites to reduce the incidence of cisplatin-associated neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, or alkylating agent-associated myelosuppression and urothelial toxicity. These studies, in the majority of instances, have not revealed any evidence of reduction in antitumour efficacy. Further randomised trials are required to identify the optimal role of chemoprotectants when used alone or in combination with other toxicity modifiers including haemopoietic growth factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10193684     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199957030-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  86 in total

1.  A preoperative single course of high-dose cisplatin and bleomycin with glutathione protection in bulky stage IB/II carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  R Fontanelli; G Spatti; F Raspagliesi; F Zunino; F Di Re
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  The role of glutathione in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Tedeschi; A De Cesare; S Oriana; P Perego; A Silva; P Venturino; F Zunino
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  The protective activity of ICRF-187 against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in the rat.

Authors:  T K Yeung; R S Jaenke; D Wilding; A M Creighton; J W Hopewell
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  The anthracycline antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  R C Young; R F Ozols; C E Myers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Modification of some of the toxic effects of daunomycin (NSC-82,151) by pretreatment with the antineoplastic agent ICRF 159 (NSC-129,943).

Authors:  E H Herman; R M Mhatre; D P Chadwick
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Controlled clinical studies with an antidote against the urotoxicity of oxazaphosphorines: preliminary results.

Authors:  W Scheef; H O Klein; N Brock; H Burkert; U Günther; H Hoefer-Janker; D Mitrenga; J Schnitker; R Voigtmann
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1979-03

7.  Prevention of cisplatin neurotoxicity with an ACTH(4-9) analogue in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R G van der Hoop; C J Vecht; M E van der Burg; A Elderson; W Boogerd; J J Heimans; E P Vries; J C van Houwelingen; F G Jennekens; W H Gispen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The effect of doxorubicin on hepatic and cardiac glutathione.

Authors:  J H Doroshow; G Y Locker; J Baldinger; C E Myers
Journal:  Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol       Date:  1979-11

9.  Risk factors for doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff; M W Layard; P Basa; H L Davis; A L Von Hoff; M Rozencweig; F M Muggia
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  A phase I trial of amifostine (WR-2721) and melphalan in children with refractory cancer.

Authors:  P C Adamson; F M Balis; J E Belasco; B Lange; S L Berg; S M Blaney; C Craig; D G Poplack
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Management of chemotherapy-induced adverse effects in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F G Jansman; D T Sleijfer; J C de Graaf; J L Coenen; J R Brouwers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Reduced levels of IGF-I mediate differential protection of normal and cancer cells in response to fasting and improve chemotherapeutic index.

Authors:  Changhan Lee; Fernando M Safdie; Lizzia Raffaghello; Min Wei; Federica Madia; Edoardo Parrella; David Hwang; Pinchas Cohen; Giovanna Bianchi; Valter D Longo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Minimising the long-term adverse effects of childhood leukaemia therapy.

Authors:  Claudia Langebrake; Dirk Reinhardt; Jörg Ritter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: pathogenesis and emerging therapies.

Authors:  Allyson J Ocean; Linda T Vahdat
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  In vivo mesna and amifostine do not prevent chloroacetaldehyde nephrotoxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Zeinab Yaseen; Christian Michoudet; Gabriel Baverel; Laurence Dubourg
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Role of MGMT in protecting against cyclophosphamide-induced toxicity in cells and animals.

Authors:  Ryan J Hansen; Susan M Ludeman; Sari J Paikoff; Anthony E Pegg; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-05-07

7.  Lack of neuroprotection by an ACTH (4-9) analogue. A randomized trial in patients treated with vincristine for Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  S Koeppen; C C P Verstappen; R Körte; M E Scheulen; D Strumberg; T J Postma; J J Heimans; P C Huijgens; B Kiburg; K Renzing-Köhler; H C Diener
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  The effect of amifostine, a cytoprotective agent, on paraquat toxicity in mice.

Authors:  Brandon K Wills; Steven Aks; Gerry E Maloney; James Rhee; Rhonda Brand; Marin Sekosan
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2007-03

9.  Relationship between phosphorylated histone H2AX formation and cell survival in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC) as a function of ionizing radiation exposure in the presence or absence of thiol-containing drugs.

Authors:  Yasushi Kataoka; Jeffrey S Murley; Kenneth L Baker; David J Grdina
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Selective cytotoxicity and combined effects of camptothecin or paclitaxel with sodium-R-alpha lipoate on A549 human non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Sherif Ibrahim; Dayuan Gao; Patrick J Sinko
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.