Literature DB >> 8790856

Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

S E Singletary1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction has become popular with patients because, compared with delayed reconstruction, it improves the cosmetic result, reduces cost and anesthetic risk, and in one stage completes most of the surgical treatment that the patient will ever require for treatment of her breast cancer. In the past, reconstruction was often delayed because of an unwarranted fear of locoregional recurrence or because the patient, having to live for some time with a flat chest wall, would be more appreciative of her reconstruction. This concept is now considered unacceptable, and many women regard this attitude as evidence of a lack of concern for the psychological impact of mastectomy.
METHOD: Provided that the breast skin is not involved with or close to the tumor, we prefer to perform the mastectomy with removal of only the nipple-areolar complex and the tumor biopsy scar. The mastectomy is otherwise the same as a standard modified radical mastectomy with removal of all breast tissue and a level I-II axillary node dissection. Our preference is to use the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap with a microvascular anastomosis because it provides a better blood supply, reduces abdominal wall muscle sacrifice, and eliminates the bulge from tunneling required by a pedicled flap. RESULT: Using the skin-sparing technique with immediate reconstruction in 545 patients with early-stage breast cancer, our overall incidence of regional recurrence was 2.6%. Of 95 patients who were followed for > four years, the recurrence rate was 4.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Regional recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy is a function of the biology of the tumor and the stage of the disease and is not affected by the use of immediate reconstruction or skin-preservation mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8790856     DOI: 10.1007/bf02305673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  The silicone controversy--when will science prevail?

Authors:  J C Fisher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Is chemotherapy effective in reducing the local failure rate in patients with operable breast cancer?

Authors:  A U Buzdar; M D McNeese; G N Hortobagyi; T L Smith; S Kau; G Fraschini; V Hug; N Ellerbroek; F A Holmes; F Ames
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap?

Authors:  M A Schusterman; S S Kroll; M E Weldon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients.

Authors:  S S Kroll; D T Netscher
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Recurrent breast cancer following immediate reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps.

Authors:  S A Slavin; S M Love; R M Goldwyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Radical mastectomy: thick vs thin skin flaps.

Authors:  I T Krohn; D R Cooper; J G Bassett
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1982-06

7.  Ruben's fat pad for breast reconstruction: a peri-iliac soft-tissue free flap.

Authors:  C R Hartrampf; R T Noel; L Drazan; F L Elliott; G K Bennett; P H Beegle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Clinical decision-making in early breast cancer.

Authors:  C M Balch; S E Singletary; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Nipple reconstruction with the double-opposing-tab flap.

Authors:  S S Kroll; S Hamilton
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  The lateral transverse thigh free flap: an alternative for autogenous-tissue breast reconstruction.

Authors:  L F Elliott; P H Beegle; C R Hartrampf
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 2.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

3.  Practice patterns in breast cancer surgery: Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Porter; Heather McMulkin-Tait
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The superficial margin of the skin-sparing mastectomy for breast carcinoma: factors predicting involvement and efficacy of additional margin sampling.

Authors:  Dengfeng Cao; Theodore N Tsangaris; Nina Kouprina; Lee Shun-Fune Wu; Charles M Balch; Russell Vang; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Direct to implant breast reconstruction by using SERI, preliminary report.

Authors:  Roy De Vita; Ernesto Maria Buccheri; Marcello Pozzi; Giovanni Zoccali
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-25

6.  Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Early Outcomes and Analysis of Postoperative Pain.

Authors:  Rafi Fredman; Cindy Wu; Mihaela Rapolti; Daniel Luckett; Jason Fine; Kandace McGuire; Kristalyn Gallagher; Michelle Roughton
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2019-02-27

7.  Oncoplastic surgery in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Rancati; Eduardo Gonzalez; Julio Dorr; Claudio Angrigiani
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-02-21

8.  The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Toni Zhong; Claire Temple-Oberle; Stefan O P Hofer; Stefan Hofer; Brett Beber; John Semple; Mitchell Brown; Sheina Macadam; Peter Lennox; Tony Panzarella; Colleen McCarthy; Nancy Baxter
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Complications after Perforated versus Nonperforated Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Kasey Leigh Wood; Ilana G Margulies; Paul L Shay; Andrew Y Ashikari; C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.