Literature DB >> 20574486

Trends in autologous breast reconstruction.

Grant W Carlson1.   

Abstract

Several trends have influenced autologous breast reconstruction in the last decade. The development of the skin-sparing mastectomy has markedly improved the aesthetic results of autologous breast reconstruction. Modifications have included purse-stringing periareolar incisions and vertical reduction pattern incisions. The increasing use of postmastectomy has had a negative impact on transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction. Delayed reconstruction may be the best option when adjuvant radiation is planned. Careful anatomic studies of the blood supply to the abdominal wall and critical outcome analyses have resulted in many refinements in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Careful patient selection is critical to avoid complications. Obesity, tobacco smoking, a history of chest wall radiation, and abdominal scars are known risk factors for wound complications. TRAM flap reconstruction should be considered a two-stage procedure regardless of nipple reconstruction. The first stage is building the foundation and framework of the breast. The second stage is essential for final adjustments to the volume, contour, and position of the breast mound.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Skin sparing mastectomy; TRAM flap; radiation

Year:  2004        PMID: 20574486      PMCID: PMC2884728          DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-829042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Plast Surg        ISSN: 1535-2188            Impact factor:   2.314


  46 in total

1.  Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  S S Kroll; A Khoo; S E Singletary; F C Ames; B G Wang; G P Reece; M J Miller; G R Evans; G L Robb
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Abdominal wall competence after free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap harvest: a prospective study.

Authors:  S Suominen; S Asko-Seljavaara; J Kinnunen; P Sainio; H Alaranta
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Selection criteria for successful immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  R V Dowden
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients.

Authors:  S S Kroll; D T Netscher
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial.

Authors:  M Overgaard; P S Hansen; J Overgaard; C Rose; M Andersson; F Bach; M Kjaer; C C Gadeberg; H T Mouridsen; M B Jensen; K Zedeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Resource cost comparison of implant-based breast reconstruction versus TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Samir Mardini; Jason C Ganz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Breast reconstruction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer: cosmesis, complications, and tumor control.

Authors:  R H Schuster; R R Kuske; V L Young; B Fineberg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer.

Authors:  M Lejour; M Dome
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Importance of right subcostal incisions in patients undergoing TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Albert Losken; Grant W Carlson; Glyn E Jones; John H Culbertson; Mark Schoemann; John Bostwick
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Abdominal wall strength, bulging, and hernia after TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S S Kroll; M A Schusterman; G P Reece; M J Miller; G Robb; G Evans
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Stuart A Robertson; Johann A Jeevaratnam; Avi Agrawal; Ramsey I Cutress
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-03-13

2.  Surgical Predictive Model for Breast Cancer Patients Assessing Acute Postoperative Complications: The Breast Cancer Surgery Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Michael M Jonczyk; Carla Suzanne Fisher; Russell Babbitt; Jessica K Paulus; Karen M Freund; Brian Czerniecki; Julie A Margenthaler; Albert Losken; Abhishek Chatterjee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  The Association of Overall Annual Hospital Volume and Perioperative Outcomes following Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ronnie L Shammas; Yi Ren; Samantha M Thomas; Brett T Phillips; Scott T Hollenbeck; Rachel A Greenup
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.