Literature DB >> 8191754

Is needle-directed breast biopsy overused?

M W Shields1, R S Smith, M F Bardwil, J K Harness.   

Abstract

We undertook this study of needle-localized breast biopsy--a frequently done surgical procedure--to examine current practice patterns and to determine if the technique is overused in any group of patients. From a retrospective review of medical records of all patients who had needle-localized breast biopsy at a teaching hospital between June 1, 1988, and October 31, 1990, we found that a total of 125 were done: 24 biopsy specimens showed malignancy (19%). Mammographic indications for biopsy were microcalcification (n = 62, or 50%), mass or density (n = 60, or 48%) and mass and calcifications (n = 3, or 2%). Indications for biopsy in patients with cancer were microcalcification (14 patients) and mass or density (10 patients). The incidence of malignancy increased with age. In patients younger than 40 years, no biopsy showed malignancy. Only 2 of 30 biopsies done in patients younger than 50 showed cancer (7%). Breast cancer was most frequently discovered in patients in the seventh and eighth decades of life, and this group accounted for 75% of "positive" biopsies. Needle-localized breast biopsy is a useful technique in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Although indications for the procedure should remain liberal, in women younger than 50, the percentage of biopsies that reveal malignancy is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8191754      PMCID: PMC1022385     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  8 in total

1.  Mammographic localization and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. A 5-year study.

Authors:  W R Thompson; J R Bowen; B A Dorman; V E Pricolo; T K Shahinian; C H Soderberg
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-06

2.  Breast immobilization for occult mass aspiration.

Authors:  J E Meyer; R A Greenes; M R Sonnenfeld
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Radiologic recommendation for breast biopsy on screening mammography reports.

Authors:  G W Geelhoed; H M Barr; D J Curtis; W W Olmsted
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Biopsy of occult breast lesions. Analysis of 1261 abnormalities.

Authors:  J E Meyer; T J Eberlein; P C Stomper; M R Sonnenfeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The current evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  N P Lang; G E Talbert; K B Shewmake; W C Diner; D Weiss; F G Bivins; K C Westbrook
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-12

7.  Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography.

Authors:  F M Hall; J M Storella; D Z Silverstone; G Wyshak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  How Many of the Biopsy Decisions Taken at Inexperienced Breast Radiology Units Were Correct?

Authors:  Özlem Demircioğlu; Meral Uluer; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2017-01-01

2.  Needle biopsy of probably benign nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  F M Hall
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.