Literature DB >> 8184346

Operative treatment of the degenerated segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion.

T S Whitecloud1, J M Davis, P M Olive.   

Abstract

Fourteen patients with a previous lumbosacral fusion underwent neural decompression and fusion of degenerated adjacent motion segment. The most common level was L3-L4, and there was an average of 3.2 (range 1-7) previous lumbosacral surgical procedures. The average interval from the first fusion until operative intervention on the degenerated adjacent segment was 11.5 years (range 3-29 years). Five patients had an uninstrumented fusion, of which only one progressed to arthrodesis. Three of these five patients with pseudarthrosis after uninstrumented fusion--and the remaining nine patients--had fusions with instrumentation. Ten of twelve instrumented fusions progressed to solid arthrodesis. The pseudoarthrosis rate of 80% was decreased to 17% with the use of supplemental instrumentation. There was a significant number of complications and poor results, especially in patients with advanced osteoporosis and those with a short interval between adjacent segment degeneration, respectively. Eleven of 14 patients reported some postoperative pain relief.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8184346     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199403000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  Changes in the adjacent segment 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Hyeong-Ki Shim; Yong Ahn; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanical study of lumbar spinal arthroplasty with a semi-constrained artificial disc (activ L) in the human cadaveric spine.

Authors:  Sung-Kon Ha; Se-Hoon Kim; Daniel H Kim; Jung-Yul Park; Dong-Jun Lim; Sang-Kook Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-03-31

3.  Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Toshitada Miwa; Hironobu Sakaura; Tomoya Yamashita; Shozo Suzuki; Tetsuo Ohwada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical Experiences of Non-fusion Dynamic Stabilization Surgery for Adjacent Segmental Pathology after Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-02-03

5.  [Effect of lumbar hybrid instrumentation and rigid fusion on the treated and the adjacent segments. A biomechanical study].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; M Akbar; C H Fürstenberg; C Carstens; S Hemmer; C Schilling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5.

Authors:  Ian J Harding; Sebastian Charosky; Raphael Vialle; Daniel H Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Outcomes of Instrumented and Noninstrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Sina Pourtaheri; Charles Billings; Michael Bogatch; Kimona Issa; Christopher Haraszti; Daniel Mangel; Elizabeth Lord; Howard Park; Remi Ajiboye; Adedayo Ashana; Arash Emami
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  Accelerated L5-S1 Segment Degeneration after Spinal Fusion on and above L4-5 : Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up Results.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Park; Dong Kyu Chin; Yong Eun Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28

9.  Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Eleftherios Archavlis; Mario Carvi y Nievas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The Changes in Range of Motion after a Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty with Charité in the Human Cadaveric Spine under Physiologic Compressive Follower Preload : A Comparative Study between Load Control Protocol and Hybrid Protocol.

Authors:  Se-Hoon Kim; Ung-Kyu Chang; Jae-Chil Chang; Kwon-Soo Chun; T Jesse Lim; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.