Literature DB >> 26652331

Outcomes of Instrumented and Noninstrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion.

Sina Pourtaheri, Charles Billings, Michael Bogatch, Kimona Issa, Christopher Haraszti, Daniel Mangel, Elizabeth Lord, Howard Park, Remi Ajiboye, Adedayo Ashana, Arash Emami.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterolateral lumbar fusion for lumbar stenosis cases requiring bilateral facetectomy in conjunction with a laminectomy. The authors evaluated 34 consecutive patients who had undergone a lumbar laminectomy, bilateral partial facetectomy, and posterolateral fusion at a single institution between 1981 and 1996. They included 25 men and 9 women with a mean age of 42 years (range, 27-57 years). Twenty-three cases were instrumented and 11 were noninstrumented. Mean follow-up was 21 years (range, 15-29 years). Outcomes evaluated included reoperation rate, clinical outcomes evaluated by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, radiographic evaluations of adjacent segmental degeneration (ASD) and lumbar lordosis, and contributing demographic factors to disease progression. At final follow-up, 17 of the 34 patients had undergone reoperation (43% of the instrumented group and 64% of the noninstrumented group). There were no differences in the reoperation rate or ODI improvement between the instrumented and noninstrumented groups (P>.05). Female patients required more revisions, had less ODI improvement, had greater postoperative ASD, and had less maintenance of their postoperative lumbar lordosis. There was no difference in maintenance of postoperative lumbar lordosis or ASD between the instrumented and noninstrumented groups. Instrumentation did not improve revision rates, clinical outcomes, or radiographic outcomes in laminectomies requiring contemporaneous facetectomies. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26652331      PMCID: PMC5561727          DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20151120-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  21 in total

1.  Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Chou; Chien-Jen Hsu; Wei-Ning Chang; Chi-Yin Wong
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Radiographic analysis of lumbar spine for low-back pain in the general population.

Authors:  M Inaoka; Y Yamazaki; N Hosono; K Tada; K Yonenobu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  The argument for instrumented decompressive posterolateral fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Fischgrund
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature.

Authors:  Paul Park; Hugh J Garton; Vishal C Gala; Julian T Hoff; John E McGillicuddy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.

Authors:  H N Herkowitz; L T Kurz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  J N Katz; S J Lipson; R A Lew; L J Grobler; J N Weinstein; G W Brick; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability.

Authors:  S Etebar; D W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  M N Kumar; A Baklanov; D Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Operative treatment of the degenerated segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion.

Authors:  T S Whitecloud; J M Davis; P M Olive
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The influence of lumbar lordosis on spinal fusion and functional outcome after posterolateral spinal fusion with and without pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Marianne Korsgaard; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Karsten Thomsen; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.